Need Help proving these equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter heavyc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving mathematical equations in the context of Discrete Mathematics. The original poster seeks assistance with two specific problems: one involving prime numbers generated by a quadratic expression and another concerning the existence of positive integers that satisfy a specific equation involving fifth powers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches to implementing C++ programs to test the equations. The first problem involves checking if the output of a quadratic expression is prime, while the second problem requires finding integers that satisfy a fifth power equation. Some participants question the initial values to use for the variables in the second problem and suggest nested loops for generating combinations.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of coding strategies and mathematical reasoning. Some participants have provided alternative code snippets and discussed the efficiency of different approaches. The conversation includes considerations of the computational complexity involved in solving the problems, with no explicit consensus reached on the best method.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints such as the range of integers (1 to 200) and the conditions that must be met for the variables in the second problem. There are also discussions about the performance of the proposed algorithms and the time taken to execute them on different hardware.

heavyc
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Need Help proving these equations!

I am in Discrete Math and i need a lot of help solving these equations and then proving them using a C++ program. If anyone could help I would really appreciate it. Please i need any sugggestions on this because i really can't seem to figure out how to do this and i can't even ask my teacher because he said that he isn't going to help us in any way.

For all integers n, 1 <= n <= 100, such that n^2 - 79n + 1601 is prime.
for a program what i got was

for( k = 1; k < 101; k++)
{
test = k^2 - (79 * k) + 1601;
for( i = 2; i < (test / 2 + 1); i++)
{
for( j = 2; j < (test / 2 + 1); j++)
{
product = i * j;
count << i << " * " << j << " = " << product <<endl;
if(product == test)
count << "success" << endl;
else
count << "fail" << endl;
}
}
}

2. There exist positive integers u, v, x, y, z, 1 <= u <= v <= x <= y <= z <= 200, such that u^5 + v^5+ x^5 + y^5 = z^5. and same thing with the C++ program but i couldn't figure this one out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
heavyc said:
for( k = 1; k < 101; k++)
{
test = k^2 - (79 * k) + 1601;
for( i = 2; i < (test / 2 + 1); i++)
{
for( j = 2; j < (test / 2 + 1); j++)
{
product = i * j;
cout << i << " * " << j << " = " << product <<endl;
if(product == test)
cout << "success" << endl;
else
cout << "fail" << endl;
}
}
}
I don't know how to prove your math relation, but you should know that the piece of code has some flaws. It will mostly print fail on the screen and occasionally it will print success and nothing more. You could write it more neatly like this:

Code:
for ( int k = 1; k <= 100; k++ )
{
  bool ok = true;
  int test = k * k - 79 * k + 1601;
  for ( int i = 2; i <= test / 2; i++ )
  {
    for ( int j = 2; j <= test / 2; j++ )
    {
       if ( i * j == test )
       {
         ok = false;
         break;
       }
    }
    
    if ( ok )
      cout << test << " was prime\n";
    else
      cout << test << " was not prime\n";  
}

Regarding the second part, writing the program is easy. Make a five times nested for loop.
 
Last edited:
thank you very much

i was wondering if u knew anything about discrete math because for that second problem what numbers would you start with because i don't know if i should let u = 1 v = 2 x = 3 y = 4 and z = 5 and then start the loop with those numbers and then try it that way??
 
heavyc said:
i was wondering if u knew anything about discrete math because for that second problem what numbers would you start with because i don't know if i should let u = 1 v = 2 x = 3 y = 4 and z = 5 and then start the loop with those numbers and then try it that way??
First set u,v,x,y all to 1. Then run nested loops to generate all 10^8 combinations. Evaluate each result, take the fifth root and check if that is an integer.
 
heavyc said:
2. There exist positive integers u, v, x, y, z, 1 <= u <= v <= x <= y <= z <= 200, such that u^5 + v^5+ x^5 + y^5 = z^5. and same thing with the C++ program but i couldn't figure this one out.

Here's a naive method for calculating this problem. :smile: Braces are for losers.

for (int u = 1; u <= 200; u++)
for (int v = u; v <= 200; v++)
for (int x = v; x <= 200; x++)
for (int y = x; y <= 200; y++)
for (int z = y; z <= 200; z++)
if (Math.pow(u, 5) + Math.pow(v, 5) + Math.pow(x, 5) + Math.pow(y, 5) == Math.pow(z, 5))
count << u << " " << v << " " << x << " " << y << " " << z << endl;
 
Gokul43201 said:
First set u,v,x,y all to 1. Then run nested loops to generate all 10^8 combinations. Evaluate each result, take the fifth root and check if that is an integer.

How do you get 10^8?
 
learningphysics said:
How do you get 10^8?
200^5 = 3.2 * 10^8.
It takes fewer iterations than that, because some numbers have a smaller range, so ~10^8. In a normal CPU it would take a few seconds or even minutes. BTW I like very much the code suggested by CRGreathouse.
 
ramollari said:
200^5 = 3.2 * 10^8.
It takes fewer iterations than that, because some numbers have a smaller range, so ~10^8. In a normal CPU it would take a few seconds or even minutes. BTW I like very much the code suggested by CRGreathouse.

200^5=32*10^10=3.2*10^11
 
learningphysics said:
200^5=32*10^10=3.2*10^11
Oops sorry, my mistake. Then it must be much more than 10^8.
 
  • #10
ramollari said:
Oops sorry, my mistake. Then it must be much more than 10^8.

I think the total is less than 10^8 once you use the condition that u<=v<=x<=y<=z
 
  • #11
learningphysics said:
I think the total is less than 10^8 once you use the condition that u<=v<=x<=y<=z

Sure, that well may be.

[tex]T=\sum^n\sum^n\sum^n\sum^n\sum^n1[/tex]

[tex]=\sum^n\sum^n\sum^n\sum^nk[/tex]

[tex]=\sum^n\sum^n\sum^n\left(\frac12k^2+\frac12k\right)[/tex]

[tex]=\sum^n\sum^n \left(\frac{1}{12}(2k^3+3k^2+k)+\frac14(k^2+k)\right) =\frac{1}{12}\sum^n\sum^n \left(2k^3+6k^2\right)[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{24}\sum^n \left(k^4+2k^3+k^2 +4k^3+6k^2+2k+4k^2+4k\right) =\frac{1}{24}\sum^n \left(k^4+6k^3+7k^2+6k+4k\right)[/tex]


[tex]=\frac{1}{720} \left(6k^5+15k^4+10k^3-k +45(k^4+2k^3+k^2) +35(2k^3+3k^2+k) +90k^2+90k\right) =\frac{1}{720} \left(6k^5+15k^4+10k^3-k +45k^4+90k^3+45k^2 +70k^3+105k^2+35k +90k^2+90k\right)[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{720} \left(6k^5+60k^4+170k^3+240k^2+124k\right) =\frac{1}{360} \left(3k^5+30k^4+85k^3+120k^2+62k\right)[/tex]

In the unlikely case that I haven't made a mistake or been confused by my own (admittedly loose) notation, you should get the answer by substituting 200 for k. This method is valid, I'm sure; it's just that it's so easy to make a transposition error with so many terms. :blushing:
 
Last edited:
  • #12
I tested the code in my ~2GHz processor and it took me around 15min. But it finally did give one answer: 27, 84, 110, 133, 144. :smile:
 
  • #13
ramollari said:
I tested the code in my ~2GHz processor and it took me around 15min. But it finally did give one answer: 27, 84, 110, 133, 144. :smile:

I rewrote the code to optimize it a bit. (The original code was posted mostly for amusement; it's so slow...) On my older computer, it finished (finding only the one solution) in 42s.

long long pow5(int num);

int main() {
const int limit = 145;
const long long limit5 = pow5(limit);
long long sumU, sumV, sumX, sumY, x5;
int u, v, x, y, z;
for (u = 1; u <= limit; u++) {
sumU = pow5(u);
for (v = u; v <= limit; v++) {
sumV = sumU + pow5(v);
for (x = v; x <= limit; x++) {
x5 = pow5(x);
sumX = sumV + x5;
if (sumX + x5 > limit5)
break; // Impossible for z to manage, sumY will be too big
for (y = x; y <= 200; y++) {
sumY = sumX + pow5(y);
z = (int)pow((double)sumY, .2);
if (sumY == pow5(z))
count << u << " " << v << " " << x << " " << y << " --> " << z << endl;
} // end y loop
} // end x loop
} // end v loop
} // end u loop
}

long long pow5(int num) {
//return pow((double)num, 5);
long long n = num;
return n * n * n * n * n;
}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K