Maximizing Capacitance: Series vs. Parallel Methods for Battery Connections

  • Thread starter Thread starter bertholf07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the configuration of capacitors connected to a battery, specifically focusing on series and parallel arrangements. The original poster presents a scenario with three capacitive blocks, each containing a different number of capacitors in series, and seeks to achieve a total equivalent capacitance of one farad (1F) using specified capacitor values.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of connecting capacitors in series and parallel, questioning the clarity of the problem statement and the definitions of the configurations. Some participants attempt to clarify the relationships between the capacitors and the total capacitance, while others express confusion about the setup.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and attempting to clarify the problem. Some have suggested specific values for the capacitors that could satisfy the total capacitance requirement, while others are still working through their understanding of the configurations involved.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of potential misunderstandings regarding the problem's wording, particularly concerning the arrangement of capacitors in series and parallel. Participants are also considering the constraints of using specific capacitor values to achieve the desired total capacitance.

bertholf07
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
A network of capacitors can be connected to a given battery in two fundamentally different ways-in serious and in parallel inlcuding any number of different combination of each. As a specific example take a seris set of capacitive blocks C1, C2, and C3 containing respectively one, two or three of the same capacitors in series in each cell. The total equivalent capacitance of the three cells in series must be one farad (1F). The capacitors may only be chosen from a slection of two, three, four , six, eight, nine or twelve farads. Parallel combinations within each cell may be used for other numbers. (Hint: this is comparable to solving for ni = 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12 the following equation:) 1/n1 + 2/n2 + 3/n3 = 1 :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bertholf07 said:
As a specific example take a seris set of capacitive blocks C1, C2, and C3 containing respectively one, two or three of the same capacitors in series[/color] in each cell.
Did you copy this problem down incorrectly? The word in red doesn't seem to agree with the rest of the problem.

- Warren
 
Yes I doubled checked it is right, basically what i get form this it there will be 3 capacitors in a series and those will be the 3 cells. Now in each cell there may be parallel capacitors..


-----|C1|--|C2|--|C3|------
| |
| |
|_________EMF___________|
 
Last edited:
The question does not make any sense, then. The problem goes on to state

Parallel combinations within each cell may be used for other numbers.

and

1/n1 + 2/n2 + 3/n3 = 1

which would indicate that the capacitors inside each cell are wired in parallel.

- Warren
 
I copied the question precisely from my worksheet and the total capacitance of the circuit must be 1F
 
Correct me if I am wrong but for capacitors in series you do 1/C(eq)=1/C1+1/C2+1/C3 and if they are in parallel it is just C(eq)=C1+C2+C3
 
Okay, well, I have no idea how the cells can be composed of 1, 2, or 3 capacitors in series and simultaneously be composed of capacitors in parallel, but let's just assume the capacitors are all in series.

The first cell is just a single capacitor, so it's total capacitance is just n1.

The second cell is composed of two identical capacitors wired in series, each of capacitance n2. Their total capacitance is:

[tex]\left( \frac{1}{n_2} + \frac{1}{n_2} \right)^{-1} = \frac{n_2}{2}[/tex]

Similarly, the capacitance of the thid cell, composed of three identical capacitors wired in series, each of capacitance n3, is just n3/3.

The total capacitance of all three cells combined in series is

[tex]\left( 1/n_1 + 2/n_2 + 3/n_3 \right)^{-1}[/tex]

Does that make sense?

- Warren
 
Yes I follow that...So the (1/n1+2/n2+3/n3)^-1 would have to equal the total capacitance of the circuit which would be 1F
 
I think I may not have explain myself the best but they in series and simultaneously be composed of capacitors in parallel. What you have are three cells which are you capacitors in series...now you can have those capacitors to be either 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, or 12. Now within those three cells you can have one or all three of those having another or many other capacitors in parallel with just that one individually.
 
  • #10
Yes, bertholf07. Can you find three values for n1, n2, and n3 to satisfy that equation? Hint: I wrote everything in twelfths to make the pattern easier to spot. In other words, write 2 as "12/6" and 3 as "12/4" and so on.

- Warren
 
  • #11
bertholf07 said:
I think I may not have explain myself the best but they in series and simultaneously be composed of capacitors in parallel. What you have are three cells which are you capacitors in series...now you can have those capacitors to be either 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, or 12. Now within those three cells you can have one or all three of those having another or many other capacitors in parallel with just that one individually.
This does not appear to be what the problem stated. The problem stated "take a seris set of capacitive blocks C1, C2, and C3 containing respectively one, two or three of the same capacitors in series in each cell."

I should also mention that you don't need any additional capacitors in parallel to make the whole series combination equal to 1F.

- Warren
 
  • #12
No I don't follow can you give me an example
 
  • #13
You should be able to find a set of values that work with just a bit of trial and error.

- Warren
 
  • #14
ok let me try
 
  • #15
so how about this if n1=2 n2=8 n3=12
 
  • #16
Looks good, bertholf07. There are a bunch of different valid solutions.

- Warren
 
  • #17
Thanks for your help Warren greatly appreciated
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K