Astrophysics Minor for Aerospace Engineering Majors - Coursework & Difficulty

  • Context: Programs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsCU
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astrophysics Minor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and coursework involved in pursuing an astrophysics minor for aerospace engineering majors. Participants explore the potential challenges and requirements associated with this academic path.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about the coursework and difficulty level of an astrophysics minor, particularly for those already studying aerospace engineering.
  • One participant suggests that an aerospace background may provide a solid foundation in math and physics necessary for astrophysics courses.
  • Another participant questions whether astrophysics is merely a specialization of physics, implying that advanced degrees may be required for deeper study.
  • A participant with experience in astrophysics coursework outlines specific courses taken, including stellar structures and cosmology, and mentions the importance of prerequisites.
  • There is a discussion about the recommended textbook by Ostlie and Carroll, with participants sharing their opinions on its content and usefulness.
  • Some participants note that while some institutions may require a graduate degree for astrophysics, others offer undergraduate options, including minors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the difficulty of the coursework or the necessity of a graduate degree in astrophysics, indicating that multiple views and uncertainties remain regarding the academic path.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various courses and prerequisites without fully resolving the requirements for an astrophysics minor. There is also uncertainty regarding the specific content and structure of programs at different institutions.

Who May Find This Useful

Aerospace engineering students considering an astrophysics minor, educators in related fields, and individuals interested in the intersection of aerospace and astrophysics may find this discussion relevant.

physicsCU
Messages
198
Reaction score
1
I am an aerospace engineering major.

Does anyone have any thoughts on how that would work? Course work involved, how hard it is?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicsCU said:
I am an aerospace engineering major.

Does anyone have any thoughts on how that would work? Course work involved, how hard it is?

Where I went there was no option for an astrophysics minor, so I'm not sure what it would entail. I suspect, however, that your aerospace training would give you a lot of the necessary background in math and physics. In the absence of any other information, I'd say go for it, but I don't have a lot to go with here.
 
Isn't astrophysics just a specialization of physics? So wouldn't you have to go to Grad School and get a ph.d. specifically in astrophysics?

PL
 
since i graduated with a degree in Honours Neural Computation & Minor in Astrophysics I may be able to help...I took it at McMaster which has some premier researchers in the field.

Lets see there were 8 courses in total(2 first year...so hopefully you'll have 6 electives)
the 2 most important courses would be
[0] stellar structures(how a star evolves and the "star map" can't remember the name but it describes the evolution of the star path...oh hell i have the book infront of me..main sequence table..>REALLLY COOL
and
[1] Cosmology the study of evolution of galaxies and multistar systems ..nebulas,blackholes, physics metric systems ...sorry its be quite a long time so i don't remeber those systesm...blah blah...

THE WONDERFUL TEXT I USED WAS ostlie and carrolls so you may just want to buy it and screw taking the minor...but anyways the other 4 courses, all
2year courses in thermo...E&M...analytical mechanics...shoot can't remmeber the last one...oh some type of modern physics course(ie quantum/statistical mechanics)

..since your in the aerospace programme i assume you've taken thermo and E&M.

SO you'll only need 4 courses(unless they want a total of 8...so check out the number of electives)
[0]Stellar structures
[1]Cosmology
[2]Modern physics
[3]Analytical mechanics
OH and i forgot the 1st year astronomy course may be requirement

ALSO some programmes may require a planetary course.

As for the coursework...easy as pie...well the way Dr.Pudritz taught both class..highly interesting(i wrote a project paper on wormholes) and mathematically technical...but pretty easy. Guess it depends on your grade goal i got B+ and A in the two astrophysics course. Mostly you do math describe reactions and processes.

All else fails just take the astrophysics courses if you ahve the prerequistes..thats what i did(by permission of the prof) then i took the other ones after.
best
 
Last edited:
neurocomp2003 said:
THE WONDERFUL TEXT I USED WAS ostlie and carrolls

I've never read Ostlie & Carroll, but Carroll & Ostlie is an excellent book. Here's a web page for the two:

http://departments.weber.edu/astrophysics/


Isn't astrophysics just a specialization of physics? So wouldn't you have to go to Grad School and get a ph.d. specifically in astrophysics?

This is true in some schools, but many offer an undergrad major (or even minor) in astrophysics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SpaceTiger: heh what's the difference between ostlie & carroll and carroll & Ostlie! NOTHING hehe...i miss ordered the authors but meh its still the same book...

bah never mind I just saw the link and there are two books with different orders of the author. But they are the same 1/2 content on Stellar physics. The blue book has only the stellar chapters while the ORANGE book has both the stellar adn cosmo(galactic evolution stuff)...

i have the orange book and i love it for its light reading(the paragraphs) but extensive technical math stuff. Its a beautifucl book I'm glad Dr. Pudritz made me by it.
 
Last edited:
neurocomp2003 said:
i have the orange book and i love it for its light reading(the paragraphs) but extensive technical math stuff. Its a beautifucl book I'm glad Dr. Pudritz made me by it.

BOB (Big Orange Book) is famed amongst astronomy undergrads. I learned a large fraction of my basic astronomy from there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K