Ideal gases and Vector calculus

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of ideal gases and their relationship to the concept of ideal fluids, particularly focusing on the definitions of irrotational flow and incompressibility in fluid dynamics. Participants explore the implications of these properties in the context of vector calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant equates the properties of an ideal gas with those of an ideal fluid, specifically mentioning nonviscous, steady flow, incompressible, and irrotational characteristics.
  • Another participant suggests that the definitions provided are more aligned with ideal fluids rather than ideal gases, noting that incompressibility implies no divergence and irrotational flow implies no curl.
  • A participant clarifies that an ideal gas is indeed compressible, which seems to contradict the properties of an ideal fluid.
  • There is a discussion about the definitions of irrotational flow, with one participant stating that irrotational functions have no angular momentum, while another points out that the definitions may not align perfectly between physics and mathematics.
  • One participant points out spelling errors in the original post, which they believe could hinder the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether an ideal gas can be considered an ideal fluid, with some asserting that the two concepts are incompatible due to the compressibility of gases. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between the properties of ideal gases and ideal fluids.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the definitions being discussed, particularly regarding the assumptions about compressibility and the context in which ideal gases and ideal fluids are defined. The discussion does not resolve these ambiguities.

bjon-07
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
In my physics book, the 4 properties of an ideal gase are

1. nonviscous
2. steady flow (laminar)
3. incompressible
4. irrotational


My question is the properties of being irrotional the same as the vector functions that have a Curl=O iff irrotational

My physics book states the irrotional functions have no angular momentum, but my caclulus book does not give a physical defention of an irrotional function, only a mathmatical defention.

So am I right to aqquate the two defentions to gether
 
Science news on Phys.org
bjon07,

This sounds more like the definition of an ideal fluid, than an ideal gas.

But your guess seems right to me. Incompressiblity implies that the flow has no divergence, so irrotational probably means no curl.

But if this is important you should wait until somebody who knows something about fluids has a chance to answer. I don't know much about them; I'm just guessing. ;-)
 
Oppss, hehe I meant Ideal fluid
 
1.An ideal gas IS AN IDEAL FLUID.

2.Incompressible,means the density constant,by the law of mass conservation,the divergence of the convective velocity field is zero.

3.Irrotational means that the curl of the convective velocity field is zero.

4.Nonviscous means no friction between neighboring fluid layers.The viscosity tensor is identically zero.The kinetic tension tensor is diagonal and has one independent component,the negative of hydrostatic pressure.

Daniel.
 
I thought most gase where compressable, pv=nrt...v can be compressed
 
Well, there is an apparent discrepancy here, how can an ideal gas be an ideal fluid when an ideal gas can be compressed, yet an ideal fluid, by definition is incompressible.

To the OP, some spelling suggestions;

gas, not gase
irrotational, not irrotional
calculus, not caclulus
definition, not defention
mathematical, not mathmatical
equate, not aqquate
together, not to gether

Please take the time to check your spelling, it can get frustrating for those who are trying to answer your question.

Claude.
 
bjon-07 said:
I thought most gase where compressable, pv=nrt...v can be compressed

It's just a semantic thing. Gases are considered to be fluids (along with liquids). What you're describing at the top is an ideal incompressible fluid. You're right that ideal gases are not incompressible.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K