Summing Up a Non-Geometric Series: Is It Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RadiationX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Sum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the summation of a non-geometric series represented by the expression \(\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{50(-2)^{n-1}3^{n+2}}{7^n}\). Participants are exploring whether this series can be summed using techniques learned for geometric series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the classification of the series as geometric and suggest grouping terms to simplify the expression. Others express uncertainty about combining exponents with different bases and inquire about manual computation methods.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to manipulate the series for simplification, with some participants providing partial guidance on how to approach the summation. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the series' nature and the methods applicable to it.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of their prior learning, specifically that they have only been taught to sum geometric series, which raises questions about the applicability of those techniques to the current problem.

RadiationX
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
I need to find the sum of:

[tex]\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{50(-2)^{n-1}3^{n+2}}{7^n}[/tex]


the only series that we've been taught to add up is geometric. the above series is not geometric,is it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RadiationX said:
I need to find the sum of:

[tex]\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{50(-2)^{n-1}3^{n+2}}{7^n}[/tex]


the only series that we've been taught to add up is geometric. the above series is not geometric,is it?

Whatever it is, it has been disquised. Try gouping all the terms you can together to the power n, and reduce everything else and see what you get.
 
is [tex]\frac{-8100}{91}[/tex] correct?
 
RadiationX said:
is [tex]\frac{-8100}{91}[/tex] correct?

Looks OK to me
 
how would you compute this series by hand? i did this on a calculator. I don't see how i can combine the exponents given that they have different bases
 
RadiationX said:
how would you compute this series by hand? i did this on a calculator. I don't see how i can combine the exponents given that they have different bases
[tex]\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{50(-2)^{n-1}3^{n+2}}{7^n}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{50 \bullet 9}{-2}\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{(-2)^{n}3^{n}}{7^n}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{50 \bullet 9}{-2}\sum_{n=2}^\infty\left(\frac{-6}{7}\right)^n[/tex]

[tex]\frac{50 \bullet 9}{-2}\left(\frac{-6}{7}\right)^2\sum_{n=0}^\infty\left(\frac{-6}{7}\right)^n[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-50 \bullet 27}{49}\sum_{n=0}^\infty\left(\frac{-6}{7}\right)^n[/tex]

If you have learned to do geometric sums, you can finish it. If you don't see how I changed the sum from n = 2 to n = 0, write out the first few terms of the sum to see how you can factor out the squared term.
 
beautiful. thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K