The second question: Kinetic Friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving kinetic friction, where a person jumps onto a sled and they coast on snow before coming to rest. The participants are exploring how to determine the coefficient of kinetic friction based on the sled's motion and the forces acting on it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between work done by friction and the kinetic energy of the sled-person system. There are inquiries about calculating horizontal force and acceleration, with some suggesting to focus on energy rather than acceleration. Questions about the calculation of work and the meaning of displacement are also raised.

Discussion Status

Several participants are offering guidance on how to approach the problem, emphasizing the energy perspective and the relationship between work and kinetic energy. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the role of acceleration and the method to find the coefficient of kinetic friction, indicating an ongoing exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the forces involved, particularly the frictional force, and clarify that the displacement is indeed 30 meters. There is some confusion regarding the calculations and the approach to take, reflecting the complexity of the problem.

nutster
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
A 65.0 kg person, running horizontally with a velocity of +4.06 m/s, jumps onto a 10.4 kg sled that is initially at rest.
(a) Ignoring the effects of friction during the collision, find the velocity of the sled and person as they move away.

Which I figured out was 3.5 m/s...now my question:

(b) The sled and person coast 30.0 m on level snow before coming to rest. What is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the sled and the snow?

Any suggestions on how to go about solving this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The work done by friction must be equal in magnitude to the kinetic energy of the sled-person system but opposite in sign for the object to be at rest after displacing 30m.

Knowing work is equal to [tex]Force \times Displacement[/tex] you can then solve for friction which then allows you to obtain the coefficient of kinetic friction.
 
How should I calculate the horizontal force, to be able to calculate F=ma? What is the acceleration?
 
The only horizontal force should be friction unless someone is pulling the sled-person system. Is it asking for an acceleration?
 
Not directly...you can see I'm lost here. I do well visualizing things with equations...maybe that'd help..?
 
nutster said:
What is the acceleration?

Thats exactly the question u should ask yourself.
Bring the three kinematic equations into your mind at this point.

-- AI
 
Don't worry about accelerations. You can if you want but it will make the problem more confusing to you I imagine. It is just an energy problem.

The thing to remember is that the [tex]f = (W \times {\Delta x}) = {\Delta KE}[/tex]

Also, remember [tex]f=\mu{mg}[/tex].
 
Ahh, there's my hangup...how do I calculate work, and is the quantity of dX just 30m?
 
gokugreene,
i too like nutster can't see what you are actually trying here?

Btw, nutster
you can use v^2 = u^2 + 2as to get acceleration since u have v,u and s
I suppose once u have 'a' , u know what to do

-- AI
 
  • #10
Yes, the change in x is 30m.

Tenali, he is looking for the coefficient of kinetic friction.

You can find the coefficient of kinetic friction using the kinematic equations as Tenali suggested, but that isn't the way the problem is meant to be worked, but it will work.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
nutster said:
Ahh, there's my hangup...how do I calculate work, and is the quantity of dX just 30m?

We use dX to represent a very small displacement. Work is the integral of the component of force in the direction of dX. In this problem, the force is the frictional force, and it is constant. That makes the integral very simple. The work is the constant force times the total distance the sled moves against that force, resulting in negative work done by friction on the sled.
 
  • #12
gokugreene said:
Don't worry about accelerations. You can if you want but it will make the problem more confusing to you I imagine. It is just an energy problem.

The thing to remember is that the [tex]f = (W \times {\Delta x}) = {\Delta KE}[/tex]

Also, remember [tex]f=\mu{mg}[/tex].

You of course meant to say

[tex]W = (f \times {\Delta x}) = {\Delta KE}[/tex]
 
  • #13
Yes, thanks for the correction!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K