What is wrong with my derivation of max speed on inclined curves?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the maximum speed of a vehicle on banked curves, comparing it to flat road scenarios. Participants explore the forces acting on the vehicle, including friction and normal force, and how these relate to the vehicle's speed.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the equations for centripetal force and the components of forces acting on a vehicle on a banked road. Questions arise regarding the assumptions made about the normal force and its relationship to gravitational force and friction.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified errors in the original poster's assumptions about the normal force. There is ongoing exploration of how to correctly derive the normal force and its implications for maximum speed. Multiple interpretations of the equations are being discussed, with some guidance provided on how to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available for deriving the normal force and maximum speed. The discussion includes considerations of the bank angle and coefficient of friction as variables in the equations.

michaelw
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
For a flat road, where a car is turning, the max speed can by found by:
Fc = Ff
mv^2/r = uFg = umg
v = sqrt(rug)

For a banked road with angle T, the max speed (i think i did this wrong)
mv^2/r = Fnsin(T) + Ffcos(T)
mv^2/r = mg*sin(T) + umg*cos(T)
v = sqrt(rg(sin(T) + ucos(T))

but sin(T) + ucos(T) can be < 1 for low u's! this doesn't make sense.. in other words its saying that in some cases, driving on a bank results in a lower max v than driving on a flat road..

what did i do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your error is in assuming that the normal force equals mg. This is incorrect for a banked road. You'll need a second equation (for the vertical forces) to solve for the normal force and thus the max speed.
 
michaelw said:
For a flat road, where a car is turning, the max speed can by found by:
Fc = Ff
mv^2/r = uFg = umg
v = sqrt(rug)

For a banked road with angle T, the max speed (i think i did this wrong)
mv^2/r = Fnsin(T) + Ffcos(T)
mv^2/r = mg*sin(T) + umg*cos(T)
v = sqrt(rg(sin(T) + ucos(T))

but sin(T) + ucos(T) can be < 1 for low u's! this doesn't make sense.. in other words its saying that in some cases, driving on a bank results in a lower max v than driving on a flat road..

what did i do wrong?
As Doc Al has pointed out, the normal force is not mg. It is the component of mg that is perpendicular to the surface + a component a centripetal force. Your first statement of the centripetal force is correct (where Ff = uFn). The trick is to find Fn.

In order to determine the normal force, you have to look at the vertical components of the forces (which sum to ___?). So there is an additional equation that you need in order to work out the normal force.

AM
 
thanks
can you please help me figure out how to find the normal force?
the vertical components should add to 0 :)
 
michaelw said:
thanks
can you please help me figure out how to find the normal force?
the vertical components should add to 0 :)
The friction force has a downward vertical component and this, together with gravity, equals the upward vertical component of the normal force:

[tex]F_{gy} + F_{fy} = F_{Ny}[/tex]

What is the vertical component of the gravitational force (easy)?

What is the downward vertical component of the friction force? (The friction force is parallel to the surface so it has a horizontal and downward component. The friction force along the surface is [itex]\mu_sF_n[/itex])

What is the upward vertical component of the normal force?

AM
 
The vertical component equation is
Fy = Fn*cos(T) - Fg - Ff*sin(T) = 0

The horizontal component is
Fx = Fc = Fn*sin(T) + Ff*cos(T) = mv^2/R

but how can i solve these to find an equation for velocity?
 
michaelw said:
The vertical component equation is
Fy = Fn*cos(T) - Fg - Ff*sin(T) = 0

The horizontal component is
Fx = Fc = Fn*sin(T) + Ff*cos(T) = mv^2/R

but how can i solve these to find an equation for velocity?

If you are still looking for maximum speed under these conditions (banked curve) the frictional force and the normal force are stll related by the coefficient of friction. You had the wrong normal force in your first post. Now that you have that corrected, you can use the friction equation.
 
how can i find what Fn is though from my equations ? Do i need to know trig rules?

The vertical component equation is
Fy = Fn*cos(T) - Fg - Ff*sin(T) = 0

The horizontal component is
Fx = Fc = Fn*sin(T) + Ff*cos(T) = mv^2/R
 
You find the normal force by solving your first equation using the fact that Ff is proportional to Fn. How are they related?

I am assuming the bank angle and the coefficient of friction are given.
 
  • #10
Fy = Fn*cos(T) - Fg - Ff*sin(T) = 0
Fn(cos(T) - u*sin(T) = Fg
Fn = Fg/(cos(T) - u*sin(T))

Is that correct? It seems weird because Fn would be negative for a high theta..
 
  • #11
michaelw said:
Fy = Fn*cos(T) - Fg - Ff*sin(T) = 0
Fn(cos(T) - u*sin(T)) = Fg <-- I added a parenthesis, OlderDan
Fn = Fg/(cos(T) - u*sin(T))

Is that correct? It seems weird because Fn would be negative for a high theta..

That is a good observation. Suppose you start with a flat track. Then Fn would have to be Fg, and your answer reduces to that result. As you increase the bank angle, your result says the normal force will increase. That is because your equations assume that as you increase the bank, you are going to go faster and maintain the maximum possible speed. What is going to happen to the normal force before that denominator goes negative? Suppose you made the bank vertical. Have you ever seen those guys on motorcycles riding inside a cylinder? Which direction do you think friction is acting in that case?
 
  • #12
ahhhhhh
that makes sense now :)
so just to be sure, in that case, Fn would be entirely the centripetal force, with no component opposing gravity (ie 90 degrees), and Ff would now oppose gravity, with the force directed up
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K