Linear first order differential equations - just a question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The general solution for a linear first order differential equation is expressed as y = \frac{1}{\mu (t)} \left[ \int \mu (s) g(s) \: ds + \mathrm{C} \right], where \mu (t) = \exp \int p(s) \: ds. When an initial condition y(t_0) = y_0 is applied, the solution modifies to y = \frac{1}{\mu (t)} \left[ \int _{t_0} ^t \mu (s) g(s) \: ds + y_0 \right]. The integral limits are crucial for incorporating the initial condition, affecting the constant \mathrm{C}. Both formulations are valid based on the context of the initial condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear first order differential equations
  • Familiarity with integration techniques
  • Knowledge of initial value problems
  • Basic concepts of exponential functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the integrating factor \mu(t) in linear differential equations
  • Explore initial value problems in differential equations
  • Learn about the implications of different initial conditions on solutions
  • Investigate applications of linear first order differential equations in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on differential equations, as well as educators teaching calculus and differential equations.

DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
I thought the general solution of the linear first order differential equation

[tex]y ^{\prime} + p(t)y = g(t), \qquad y\left( t_0 \right) = y_0[/tex]

were

[tex]y = \frac{1}{\mu (t)} \left[ \int \mu (s) g(s) \: ds + \mathrm{C} \right],[/tex]

where

[tex]\mu (t) = \exp \int p(s) \: ds[/tex]

However, I have found this

[tex]y = \frac{1}{\mu (t)} \left[ \int _{t_0} ^t \mu (s) g(s) \: ds + y_0 \right],[/tex]

where

[tex]\mu (t) = \exp \int _{t_0} ^t p(s) \: ds[/tex]

Can anybody please clarify that? I don't see why those integral limits should be there. Any help is highly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
general solution correct.

however, in this case, integration limits needed for initial condition:

[tex]y\left( t_0 \right) = y_0[/tex]

that is:

[tex]\mu (t_0) = \exp \int _{t_0} ^{t_0} p(s) \: ds = \exp(0) = 1[/tex]

[tex]y(t_0) = \frac{1}{\mu (t_0)} \left[ \int _{t_0} ^{t_0} \mu (s) g(s) \: ds + y_0 \right] = \frac {1} {1} \left [(0) \ + \ y_0 \right ] \ = \ y_0[/tex]

nothing really complicated here
 


The general solution of a linear first order differential equation is given by the formula y = \frac{1}{\mu (t)} \left[ \int \mu (s) g(s) \: ds + \mathrm{C} \right], where \mu (t) = \exp \int p(s) \: ds. This formula is correct and can be used to find the general solution to any linear first order differential equation. However, in the specific case where we have an initial condition y(t_0) = y_0, the value of \mathrm{C} can be determined using this condition. This results in the second formula y = \frac{1}{\mu (t)} \left[ \int _{t_0} ^t \mu (s) g(s) \: ds + y_0 \right], where \mu (t) = \exp \int _{t_0} ^t p(s) \: ds. The integral limits are necessary in this case because we are integrating from the initial time t_0 to the current time t. The presence of the initial condition y(t_0) = y_0 also affects the value of \mathrm{C}, hence the difference in the formula. Both formulas are correct and can be used depending on the given initial condition. I hope this clarifies the confusion.
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
170
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K