Ratio of charges in Coulomb's Law problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter podboy6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in electrostatics, specifically applying Coulomb's Law to determine the ratio of charges between three particles positioned along the x-axis. The scenario involves two fixed charged particles and a third particle that is free to move, with the condition that the net electrostatic force on it is zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the net force being zero on the third particle, questioning the conditions under which this can occur. There are discussions about the nature of the charges involved and the relationships between the distances and forces acting on the particles.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the necessary conditions for the forces acting on the third particle to balance, while others are still grappling with the visualization of the problem and the implications of the charge configurations. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the charges and distances.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem explicitly states that all particles are charged, which is a critical assumption in analyzing the forces involved. There is also mention of previous discussions on similar problems, indicating that this is a common topic of inquiry.

podboy6
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Just got out of my E&M class lecture about Coulombs Law, I'm having trouble getting off of the ground with an electrostatics question:

Question: Three charged particles lie on the x-axis (fig. 1). Particles 1 and 2 are fixed. Particle 3 is free to move, but the electrostatic force on it from particles 1 and 2 is zero. [tex]\mathbf{L}_{23} = \mathbf{L}_{12}[/tex], what is the ratio of [tex]\mbox{$\frac{q_1}{q_2}}[/tex]?

Fig. 1

-----O------------O----------------O-------------x (positive x axis)

[tex]\mathbf{L}_{12}[/tex] is the distance between Particles 1 and 2.
[tex]\mathbf{L}_{23}[/tex] is the distance between Particles 2 and 3

This is from a section dealing exclusively with Coulombs law, so in this case I believe I am obligated to use it. I'm thinking of relating the forces on particle 1 to particles 2 and three in:

[tex]\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}||q_{2}|}{(L_{12})^2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{|q_{1}||q_{2}|}{(L_{23})^2}[/tex]

I'm not sure this will work, but I'm not sure how to accomplish this task. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3 is free to move, but the electrostatic force on it from particles 1 and 2 is zero
Your solution is going to revolve around this fact. Draw a force diagram for Particle 3. For the force to be 0, what has to be true about the interactions between all the particles?

edit: There was another thread with this exact problem, if you do a search I'm sure you'll find it.
 
For the electrostatic force to be zero from particles 1 and 2, then shouldn't,#1 both 1 and 2 are electrically neutral and particle 3 is charged, #2 particles 1 and 2 are charged and particle 3 is neutral, or #3 all particles are neutral?

If #1 or #2 are the case, then as particle 3 moves towards 2, a charge should be induced on the neutral particle.

I guess I'm still having a hard time visualizing it and getting off the ground. And its my first day of E&M summer class.
 
It tells you that all the particles are charged.
The net force on particle 3 is zero.
If you have two forces acting on it, then the only way this can happen is if the forces are equal and opposite.
 
ok, so then:

[tex]\Sigma\overrightarrow{F_3} = \overrightarrow{F_{13}} + \overrightarrow{F_{23}} = 0[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \Large [ \normal \frac{|q_1||q_2|}{(2L)^2} + \frac{|q_1||q_2|}{L^2} \Large ]\normal = 0[/tex]

is this sort of on the right track? I wound up getting [tex]q_2 = -\frac{1}{4}q_1[/tex] a little later on down the road.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
6K