What is the Purest Method for Measuring Low-Energy Particle Momentum?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on identifying the most effective experimental apparatus for measuring the momentum of low-energy particles, with a focus on achieving the purest measurement possible in accordance with the uncertainty principle. The scope includes theoretical considerations, experimental techniques, and potential methodologies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that momentum is typically measured using the formula R=pc/qB, where R is the radius of the particle's path in a magnetic field, indicating a standard approach to momentum measurement.
  • Another participant proposes an experimental setup analogous to the double-slit experiment, where interference effects could be observed by manipulating the momentum states of a particle beam, although the specifics of creating such beams remain unclear.
  • A different participant advocates for using crystal diffraction as a method for achieving pure momentum measurements, noting that a monochromator made from a pure monocrystal can impose a Bragg condition for momentum selection, albeit at the cost of position uncertainty.
  • Another suggestion involves using a hemispherical electron analyzer, particularly in the context of angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), where the momentum of low-energy electrons can be effectively measured.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views on the best method for measuring low-energy particle momentum, with no consensus reached on a singular approach. Each proposed method has its own merits and limitations, reflecting the complexity of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about the relationship between position and momentum measurements, highlighting the trade-offs involved in different experimental setups. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical or technical details of the proposed methods.

Nicky
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
What kind of experimental apparatus provides the purest measurement of a low-energy particle's momentum? By "pure" momentum measurement, I mean allowing for the maximum achievable uncertainty in position, and therefore the most accurate possible reading of momentum as per the uncertainty principle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is usually measured by R=pc/qB (in Gaussian units).
The measurement is of the radius of the path of a moving particle of charge q i a magnetic field B..
 
Meir Achuz said:
Momentum is usually measured by R=pc/qB (in Gaussian units).
The measurement is of the radius of the path of a moving particle of charge q i a magnetic field B..

I am trying to imagine how one would display interference effects analogous to the double-slit experiment, except that the roles of position and momentum are reversed. With the usual double-slit setup, the beam components passing through the two slits interfere, resulting in some spots on the detection screen that receive less total particle flux. So in the alternative experiment, I guess interference would be manifest as certain path radii showing stronger particle flux than others.

How to produce the two interfering beams is less clear. Maybe a single beam could be split into two, somehow doppler shift one of the two beams, then recombine the two beams to form a superposition of momentum states. Has anything like this been attempted?
 
Nicky said:
What kind of experimental apparatus provides the purest measurement of a low-energy particle's momentum? By "pure" momentum measurement, I mean allowing for the maximum achievable uncertainty in position, and therefore the most accurate possible reading of momentum as per the uncertainty principle.

Xtal diffraction ! At least, that's how it is done with slow neutrons: a monochromator is nothing else but a pure monocrystal (for instance, of silicium) and by selecting an outgoing angle you impose a Bragg condition and hence a pure momentum.
The bigger and the purer the Xtal is, the better your momentum selection (and of course the worse your position, because it is limited to the entire Xtal).

cheers,
Patrick.
 
Nicky said:
What kind of experimental apparatus provides the purest measurement of a low-energy particle's momentum? By "pure" momentum measurement, I mean allowing for the maximum achievable uncertainty in position, and therefore the most accurate possible reading of momentum as per the uncertainty principle.

How about a hemispherical electron analyzer?

My avatar is actually a 2D plot of E vs. k of electrons coming out of a material from a photoemission process and into a Scienta SES200 electron analyzer. And we all know that "k" is equivalent to the momentum, in this case, the momentum of the electron and the crystal. ("crystal momentum") So the horizontal axis is really the momentum of the electrons. And these ARE low energy electrons, with energy in the range of ~0 to about 10 eV.

This is now a common technique in angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), so most papers using this technique will have references to it.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K