Measurement and the Conservation of Momentum

In summary, In the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics, a particle behaves as if it has a momentum before it is measured.
  • #1
Bernard Brault
2
0
If you prepare a particle with a “relatively precise” momentum by the act of filtering or measuring its momentum. It’s state will collapse into a momentum eigenstate and the measured momentum will be the corresponding eigenvalue.
The position state will now be nearly uniformly spread out and the position unknown. But you can do a position measurement and the particle will register at a specific location but now it is the momentum that becomes unknown.

That seems to violate the principle of conservation of momentum. Prior to measuring position, we knew it’s monentum.

Possibly in both cases, it is the expected value of momentum that does not change.

But after measuring position, you could measure momentum again and get a different value then what you started with.
Where did the original momentum go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Bernard Brault said:
If you prepare a particle with a “relatively precise” momentum by the act of filtering or measuring its momentum. It’s state will collapse into a momentum eigenstate and the measured momentum will be the corresponding eigenvalue.
The position state will now be nearly uniformly spread out and the position unknown. But you can do a position measurement and the particle will register at a specific location but now it is the momentum that becomes unknown.

That seems to violate the principle of conservation of momentum. Prior to measuring position, we knew it’s monentum.

Possibly in both cases, it is the expected value of momentum that does not change.

But after measuring position, you could measure momentum again and get a different value then what you started with.
Where did the original momentum go?
The process of measuring position affects the momentum of the particle.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #3
Bernard Brault said:
Where did the original momentum go?
The measurement involves an exchange of momentum between the particle and the measuring device, so the total momentum of the combined system is conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #4
Nugatory said:
The measurement involves an exchange of momentum between the particle and the measuring device, so the total momentum of the combined system is conserved.
In delayed measurements, where does the missing momentum goes?
It appears that cheating is allowed as long as you cannot catch the cheater.
 
  • #5
Bernard Brault said:
In delayed measurements, where does the missing momentum goes?
It appears that cheating is allowed as long as you cannot catch the cheater.
You'll have to describe the exact measurement scenario before we can properly resolve the paradox that you're seeing. Nonetheless, we know how it has to turn out: the momentum operator commutes with the complete Hamiltonian of the quantum system, so one way or another momentum is going to be conserved.

You do want to be aware that popular descriptions of how the uncertainty principle allows for unobserved violations of classical conservation laws (quantum fluctuations of energy, virtual particles popping in and out of existence, that we can cheat on momentum conservation as long as the cheating is not detected) are terribly misleading.
 
  • #6
Nugatory said:
You'll have to describe the exact measurement scenario before we can properly resolve the paradox that you're seeing. Nonetheless, we know how it has to turn out: the momentum operator commutes with the complete Hamiltonian of the quantum system, so one way or another momentum is going to be conserved.

You do want to be aware that popular descriptions of how the uncertainty principle allows for unobserved violations of classical conservation laws (quantum fluctuations of energy, virtual particles popping in and out of existence, that we can cheat on momentum conservation as long as the cheating is not detected) are terribly misleading.

With regards to a single particle, I am not clear how under certain interpretations it can be thought to have a momentum value until measured. What I am thinking about is the Copenhagen Interpretation for example and the double slit experiment. I thought the "particle" was supposed to pass through all slits at the same time, and since getting to the slits involves velocities in different directions (or so I would assume) I was not clear on how prior to being measured the particle could be thought to have a momentum. So using the Copenhagen Interpretation is the "particle" in the double slit experiment thought to have a momentum prior to measurement?
 
  • #7

1. What is meant by "measurement" in the context of conservation of momentum?

Measurement refers to the process of quantifying the physical properties of objects, such as mass and velocity, and using these measurements to calculate the momentum of a system. In the context of conservation of momentum, accurate measurement is crucial in determining whether momentum is conserved or not.

2. How is momentum conserved in a closed system?

In a closed system, the total momentum before and after a collision or interaction remains constant. This means that the sum of the momenta of all objects in the system before the interaction is equal to the sum of the momenta after the interaction. This is known as the law of conservation of momentum.

3. Can momentum be lost in a collision?

No, momentum cannot be lost in a collision. According to the law of conservation of momentum, the total momentum of a system must remain constant. This means that any momentum lost by one object in a collision must be gained by another object in the system.

4. How do you calculate momentum?

Momentum is calculated by multiplying an object's mass by its velocity. The formula for momentum is p = m x v, where p is momentum in kg∙m/s, m is mass in kg, and v is velocity in m/s. It is important to note that momentum is a vector quantity, meaning it has both magnitude and direction.

5. What is the difference between elastic and inelastic collisions?

In an elastic collision, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved. This means that the objects involved in the collision bounce off each other without any loss of energy. In an inelastic collision, momentum is conserved but kinetic energy is not. This means that some energy is lost during the collision, usually in the form of heat or sound.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
313
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
270
Replies
75
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
675
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
992
Back
Top