- 1,958
- 7
http://www.planetary.org/voyager_hubble/
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion revolves around the potential discontinuation of the Hubble Space Telescope and the implications of such a decision, particularly in relation to the James Webb Space Telescope and the Voyager missions. Participants explore the value of Hubble's continued operation, the capabilities of current and future telescopes, and the allocation of funding in space exploration.
Participants express differing views on the necessity and future of the Hubble Space Telescope, with no consensus reached on whether it should be maintained or decommissioned. There are competing perspectives on the capabilities of Hubble versus Webb and the implications of funding decisions.
Participants reference the operational capabilities of telescopes and the potential for complementary observations, but there are unresolved questions regarding the specifics of funding allocations and the long-term viability of Hubble.
I think a good question would be "what can Hubble and Webb do together that neither could do alone?" Webb will be optimised for longer wavelenths and will likely discover things that would benefit from HST follow-up. Ditching HST into the ocean will be a terrible waste, and after Webb comes on line, we will find out just how big our loss is when our ability to do follow-ups is limited by atmospheric conditions at the big ground-based scopes.wolram said:Question, what will money saved by abandoning the Hubble be spent on ?
It is the James Webb telescope:Pengwuino said:Arent they constructing a new telescope that is an improved version of Hubble? Heard something liek it a long time ago so i might be wrong.