What is the equation for calculating the moment of inertia of a propeller?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the moment of inertia for a propeller, with participants exploring different equations and methods for determining this value. The scope includes theoretical considerations, experimental approaches, and practical applications related to propeller design and analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the equation 2/3MR² for the moment of inertia, while considering an alternative equation, 1/12M(L² + B²), based on modeling the propeller as a flat rectangular piece.
  • Another participant proposes that a more accurate approach would be to approximate the moment of inertia of a single propeller blade and multiply it by the number of blades, depending on the blade's shape and mass distribution.
  • A participant inquires about experimental methods to measure the moment of inertia directly.
  • Another participant mentions that if a propeller is available, it is relatively straightforward to determine the moment of inertia experimentally using a pendulum method, which is often used as a sanity check against theoretical models.
  • One participant asks for clarification on how to perform the pendulum experiment, expressing concern about the variability of the period equation due to differences in inertia among objects.
  • A participant shares a link to a resource that outlines the pendulum method, noting the importance of keeping the initial displacement small for accurate results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate equations for calculating the moment of inertia, with no consensus reached on a single correct approach. Additionally, there is discussion about the feasibility of experimental methods, but no agreement on a specific procedure is established.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence of the moment of inertia calculation on the shape and mass distribution of the propeller blades, suggesting that assumptions made in modeling can significantly affect the results. The discussion also notes the importance of small initial displacements in pendulum experiments for accurate measurements.

Moolan
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I am currently working on a project where i need to find the work out from a propeller. But to do so, i need to know the moment of inertia of the propeller. I did a search online and i found that the moment of inertia is

2/3MR^2

I was thinking of assuming the propeller to be a flat rectangular piece then i can use

1/12M(L^2 + B^2)

I need help in deciding which equation is right... as both equation differs quite a lot. Or is the moment of inertia of a propeller something else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, a more accurate model would be to approximate the moment of intertia of one propellor blade and then multiply that by the number of blades to get the total moment of inertia. Depending on the shape of such a blade you might decide whether you want to use a rectangular board, a cilinder or something else to model it. Think about the shape and mass distribution of the blade.
 
Is there an experiment which i could carry out to calculate that inertia?
 
If you actually have a propeller it is rather easy to determine the moment of inertia experimentally. If you can count the oscillations of a pendulum you can calculate the moment of inertia. We do it quite often as a sanity check against models on rotors and such.
 
I do have a tachometer. Could you outline the way how the experiment can be performed?

Edit: Do you actually mean using the pedulum experiement and do some algebraic manipulation to get the Inertia? But I tought that the period equation varies from object to objects due to difference in inertia.
 
Last edited:
Instead of typing it all out, I found this: http://www.eng.fsu.edu/dynamics1/inertia/inertia.doc

One note is that the initial displacement of the pendulum has to be relatively small (<15° or so) so that sinq = q.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the link, everything is now making more sense :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K