Deriving Speed and Period of Rotating Disk System with Attached Small Disk

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a system of two disks, where a small disk is attached to a larger disk, and the assembly rotates about a frictionless axle. The goal is to derive the speed of the small disk as it passes through the equilibrium position and the period of its motion after being displaced from equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of torque and moment of inertia, with some suggesting the use of the parallel axis theorem to compute the moment of inertia of the small disk. There is a debate about whether integration is necessary due to the non-constant angular acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on recognizing the harmonic motion of the system and the validity of approximations for small angles. There is an ongoing clarification regarding the correct formulation of the moment of inertia and the torque involved in the system.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of rotational dynamics, including the implications of small angle approximations and the assumptions made about the system's behavior. There is a focus on ensuring the correct application of physical principles without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Wen
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
A small thin disk of radius r and mass m is attached rigidly to the face of a second thin disk of radius R and mass M. The centre of the small disk is located at the edge of the large disk. The large disk is mounted on its centre of a frictionless axle. the assembly is rotated through a small angle theetre from its equilibrium position and then released. Show that the speed of the small disk as it passes through the equilibrium position is

v=2{Rg(1-cos theetre)/[ M/m+ (r/R)^2+2]}^0.5

and the period is

T=2pi {[(M+2m)R^2+mr^2]/[2mgR]}^0.5

I am stuck in the first part already.
My method was: Since the axis of rotation is through the COM of the larger disk, hence the nett torque is mgRsin theetre.
This torque is equal to I alpha which is equal to (1/2MR^2+mR^2) alpha.
angular aceleration is not constant so i must carry out an integration when using the eqn V^2=U^2+2aS

i have been struggling with this prob. for a long time . pl help me.
 

Attachments

  • P1010211.JPG
    P1010211.JPG
    16.2 KB · Views: 881
Physics news on Phys.org
Wen said:
A small thin disk of radius r and mass m is attached rigidly to the face of a second thin disk of radius R and mass M. The centre of the small disk is located at the edge of the large disk. The large disk is mounted on its centre of a frictionless axle. the assembly is rotated through a small angle theetre from its equilibrium position and then released. Show that the speed of the small disk as it passes through the equilibrium position is

v=2{Rg(1-cos theetre)/[ M/m+ (r/R)^2+2]}^0.5

and the period is

T=2pi {[(M+2m)R^2+mr^2]/[2mgR]}^0.5

I am stuck in the first part already.
My method was: Since the axis of rotation is through the COM of the larger disk, hence the nett torque is mgRsin theetre.
This torque is equal to I alpha which is equal to (1/2MR^2+mR^2) alpha.
angular aceleration is not constant so i must carry out an integration when using the eqn V^2=U^2+2aS

i have been struggling with this prob. for a long time . pl help me.
You don't have to do an integration. You can regognize the differential equation [itex]\theta = k\ddot{\theta}[/itex] as the harmonic equation. It has a general solution of [itex]\theta (t)= A\cos{\sqrt{k}t} + B\sin{\sqrt{k}t}[/itex] for constants A and B to be determined by initial conditions. Remember that it was specified that the angle was small, so the approximation [itex]\sin{\theta} \approx \theta[/itex] is valid. Also, you don't have the moment of inertia correct. I is equal to the moment of inertia of the big disk plus that of the small disk. The moment of inertia of the large one is simply [itex]\frac{MR^2}{2}[/itex], while the second can be computed with the use of the parallel axis theorem. I am getting a slightly different answer than the one you gave. I get the 2 in v=2{...}^.5 to be inside the square root. One of us made a mistake, so just check and make sure it isn't you.
 
no it was correct.2 is outside of the sq. rt.
But the angular a is not constant, so i thought a integration must be carried out?

I was using the parallel axis theorem: 1/2MR^2 + mR^2
 
Wen said:
I was using the parallel axis theorem: 1/2MR^2 + mR^2
Where did you use the parallel axis theorem? Here you are treating the small disk as a point mass, which it is not. Use the parallel axis theorem to find the rotational inertia of the small disk about the axis of the large disk. (You neglected the rotational inertia of the small disk about its own center.)
 
No, there is no need for integration. Once you use the approximation [itex]\sin{\theta} \approx \theta[/itex], then it simply becomes the harmonic equation, for which the solution is known. The parallel axis theorem says that the moment of inertia of the small disk is [itex]\frac{mr^2}{2} + mR^2[/itex]. Combine that with the moment of inertial of the larger disk to get [itex]\frac{mr^2}{2} + mR^2 +\frac{MR^2}{2} = (\frac{M}{2} + m)R^2 + \frac{mr^2}{2}[/itex].
 
The Restoring torque is given by

tau = - mgR@

hence torque constant K is mgR
 

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K