Solving a Homogeneous Linear Equation for x>0

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a basis of solutions for a second-order homogeneous linear equation, specifically a Cauchy-Euler equation, for positive values of x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the form of potential solutions, particularly y = x^r, and question the nature of Cauchy-Euler equations. Some express confusion about specific cases regarding double and complex conjugate roots and their implications for the general solution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing insights and raising questions about the characteristics of the equation and the reasoning behind certain solution forms. There is an exploration of different interpretations regarding the conditions for positive x.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints related to the behavior of solutions for different types of roots and the specific focus on positive x in the context of the problem.

asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
Can someone give suggestions for this question?

Find a basis of solutions for the following second-order homogeneous linear equation for positive x:
x^2y``-xy`+y=0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what a Cauchy-Euler equation is?
 
Also called an "equi-potential" equation since the "power" of x is always "equal" to the order of the derivative.

What happens if you try a solution of the form y= xr for some real number r?
 
i don't know what a Cauchy-Euler equation is, but how'd you think of
HallsofIvy said:
.
What happens if you try a solution of the form y= xr for some real number r?
 
ok, I've taken a look at the Cauchy-Euler equation in the AEM textbook, but there's two things that i think are strange:

1) for the case of double roots, the proof to the general solution only considers
x>O... why?
2) for the case of complex conjugate roots, there's only a general solution for all
positive x... why?

btw, I've been thinking all day of y=x^r... I'm still stumped over how'd you think of that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K