Variation of the quadratic formula?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving an alternative form of the quadratic formula from the standard version. Participants explore methods for manipulating the formula and express uncertainty about the derivation process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares a link to a resource that presents a different form of the quadratic formula and requests assistance in deriving it.
  • Another participant suggests using the product of the two forms of the quadratic formula to simplify and derive the alternative version.
  • A different approach is proposed involving multiplying by a cleverly chosen form of 1, specifically the conjugate of the numerator, to manipulate the expression.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of rationalizing the equation and express confusion about the terminology used, particularly regarding the direction of the manipulation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods for deriving the alternative quadratic formula, but there is no consensus on the terminology or the clarity of the derivation process. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of the derivation steps and the definitions of terms like "rationalizing" and "backwards," which some participants find ambiguous.

toltol123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
http://www.mste.uiuc.edu/users/exner/ncsa/quad/

There's another way of writing the quadratic formula...but how do I derive the 2nd formula using the 1st one? I've tried for hours and I can't get it. I would really appreciate any help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hint:
[tex](-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac})(-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac})=4ac[/tex]
Take the two different forms, set them equal to each other and simplify. But you have to know that the lower sign of the plus/minus in the one form corresponds to the upper sign in the other form.
 
Alternatively, multiply with 1 in a smart manner:
[tex]\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}*1=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{2a}*\frac{-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}{-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}=\frac{b^{2}-(b^{2}-4ac)}{2a(-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac})}=\frac{2c}{-b\mp\sqrt{b^{2}-4ac}}[/tex]

The alternate version is often used if the numerator in the standard version becomes a difference between almost equal numbers.
I.e, we may avoid loss of significant digits by using the alternate version.
 
Last edited:
oh, so in a way I'm rationalizing the equation and just multiplying by the conjugate? except it's backwards, because the radical is moved to the bottom.
 
toltol123 said:
oh, so in a way I'm rationalizing the equation and just multiplying by the conjugate? except it's backwards, because the radical is moved to the bottom.
Yes, you multiply with 1 in the form of the conjugate of the numerator.
Thus, the root expression vanishes from the numerator but reappears in the denominator.
I'm not too sure about what you mean by "rationalizing" and "backwards", though..
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K