Physics:finding torque equation in static equilibrium

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the torque equation in the context of static equilibrium, particularly focusing on the forces involved and their contributions to torque calculations. Participants are examining the role of specific forces and the pivot point in the torque equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning which forces should be included in the torque equation, particularly whether forces at the pivot point should be considered. There is also discussion about the definition and location of the pivot point in the provided diagrams.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring various interpretations of the torque equation and the relevance of different forces. Some participants have provided insights into the torque calculation, while others are still seeking clarification on the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of diagrams that may lack clarity, which could affect the understanding of the pivot point and lever arm. Participants are also reflecting on the specific forces and their orientations in relation to the lever arm.

r3dxP
http://www.rwc.uc.edu/koehler/biophys/2h.html
search keyword : " 80 W sin 13 = 40 W l sin 13 + 7 Fj cos 45 "

look at the picture above the keyword you just searched for..
i don't understand why you would add 7 Fj cos45 to the torque equation. I thought we only consider the forces perpendicular to the 'lever arm'. The Fj is on the pivot, so shouldn't we not take Fj into consideration for the torque equation? thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Those diagrams could use some better clarification, where's the pivot point?
 
whozum said:
Those diagrams could use some better clarification, where's the pivot point?
well, I am guessing that the pivot of this diagram is the little line, which would be the 'joint'.and the lever arm would be the long line part.
 
I guess the pivot point is the point where the arrow with the 80 right next to it is pointing.In that case, [itex]F_j[/itex] does apply a torque about that point since it is not parallel to the smallest thick line. I guess that's the best way to illustrate that given that diagram?
 
well.. what exactly are you suppose to include in your torque equation? i thought only tthe forces that are perpendicular to lever arm(the main base line) are only considered in the torque equation..
 
Any force component that is perpendicular to the lever arm. If your level arm vector is [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] and your force vector is [itex]\vec{F} [/tex] then your torque equation would be<br /> <br /> [itex]\tau = \vec{r} \times \vec{F} [/tex] which evaluates to [itex]\tau = |\vec{r}||\vec{F}|\sin(\theta)[/tex] where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the included angle. If the vectors are completely parallel (or antiparallel) the included angle is 0 (or [itex]\pi[/itex]) and the sin of the angle will give 0, resulting in the torque being 0. Otherwise, the sin value scales the quantity to provide the correct amount of torque given the angle between the vectors.[/itex][/itex][/itex]
 
oh, i got it thanks a bunch
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K