Why Can't I Prove Divisibility Using Mathematical Induction?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of proving divisibility using mathematical induction, specifically focusing on two problems: proving that \( n^3 + 2n \) is divisible by 3 for non-negative integers and showing that the series \( 1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + ... + 1/n^2 \) is less than \( 2 - 1/n \) for integers greater than 1. Participants explore various approaches and express difficulties in manipulating expressions during the inductive steps.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their struggle with proving that \( n^3 + 2n \) is divisible by 3, detailing their attempts to manipulate the expression for the inductive step.
  • Another participant provides a reformulation of \( (n+1)^3 + 2(n+1) \) to show its relationship to \( n^3 + 2n \), suggesting that if the latter is divisible by 3, so is the former.
  • A different participant presents an alternative approach that does not rely on induction, arguing that since one of \( n, n+1, n+2 \) must be divisible by 3, the original expression is also divisible by 3.
  • One participant expresses frustration over a mistake in their binomial expansion, acknowledging the contribution of another participant in clarifying the proof.
  • Another participant shares their difficulty in proving that the series \( 1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + ... + 1/n^2 \) is less than \( 2 - 1/n \), indicating challenges in manipulating the inequality during the inductive step.
  • A later reply offers a potential simplification of the inequality involved in the second problem, although it is unclear how it fits into the overall proof.
  • Participants express mixed feelings about the process of induction, with some finding it straightforward while others feel stuck.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to proving the divisibility problems. Multiple competing views and methods are presented, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the effectiveness of the various strategies discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about specific algebraic manipulations and the validity of their approaches. There are indications of missing steps or assumptions in the proofs being discussed.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in mathematical induction, divisibility proofs, and series inequalities may find the discussion relevant and insightful.

waterchan
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I've been working on this problem for the past two and a half hours. The problem is: Prove by induction that n^3 + 2n is divisible by 3 for non-negative integer values of n.

No matter how I try, I cannot manipulate the expression of the inductive step so that it is divisible by 3.

I have done the base step and assumed that P(k): k^3 + 2k is divisible by 3. Now I need to show that this implies that P(k+1): (k+1)^3 + 2(k+1) is divisible by 3. I have tried manipulating P(k+1) in probably every possible way. The closest I have got to solving the problem, is getting part of the expression to be k^3 + 2k (which is divisible by 3 by assumption) and a constant 3.

(k+1)^3 + 2(k+1)

= k^3 + 2k^2 + 2k + 1 + 2k + 2

= k^3 + 2k^2 + 4k + 3

I also tried P(k+1) - P(k) and see if that would give an expression that is factorizable by 3. (Since the difference of two integers a and b is divisible by x, if and only if a and b are divisible by x.)

P(k+1) - P(k)

= [(k+1)^3 + 2(k+1)] - [k^3 + 2k]

= [k^3 + 2k^2 + 2k + 1 + 2k + 2] - [k^3 + 2k]

= 2k^2 + 2k + 3

which does not lead to a desirable expression.



I think I've exhausted all the options that I know of. Can anyone help me please? :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that [itex](n+1)^3 + 2(n+1) = n^3 + 3 n^2 + 5 n + 3 = n^3 + 2 n + 3(n^2 + n + 1)[/itex]

Therefore, if [itex]n^3 + 2n[/itex] is divisible by 3 then so is [itex](n+1)^3 + 2(n+1)[/itex]
 
P.S. This is not by induction but I noticed that

[tex]n^3 + 2 n = n^3 + 3 n^2 + 2 n - 3n^2 = n(n+1)(n+2) - 3n^2[/tex]

Since n is an integer then one of n, n+1 and n+2 must be divisible by 3 as is [itex]3n^2[/itex] so the original expression is divisible by 3 as well.
 
Arrrrgh damn it, no wonder I couldn't get it right. I got the binomial expansion wrong! Thanks a lot, Tide, and that's a neat second proof. Can't believe I wasted a couple hours due to a stupid slip-up...
 
Last edited:
Another one I absolutely could not do (and this time I'm sure it's not due to fumbling algebra) is this:

Prove by induction that (1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + ... + 1/n^2) is less than (2 - 1/n) for all integers greater than 1.

I get the base step, then make the assumption p(k) is true. Then I add 1/(k+1)^2 to both sides of the inequality.

(1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + ... + 1/k^2 + 1/(k+1)^2) < 2 - 1/k + 1/(k+1)^2

I guess the desired result is to prove that the RHS is less than 2 - 1/(k+1), but I cannot achieve that at all. This one seems definitely more difficult than the last one. Can anybody help me please?
 
Does this help?

[tex]-\frac {1}{k} + \frac {1}{(k+1)^2} < -\frac {1}{k} + \frac {1}{k+1}[/tex]
 
Thanks a lot, Tide. Actually I got something similar to that, and THEN gave up, not sure how to proceed. Induction sure is a great way to get stuck :(
 
Actually, induction is the easy part! Someone else did the grunt work of figuring out the appropriate inequality in the first place.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K