Struggling with Integration by Parts? Try a New Approach with Secant Functions!

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the secant function, specifically focusing on the method of integration by parts as it relates to calculus problems typically encountered in a Calculus II course.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the integration of sec(x) using integration by parts, while others question whether this method is appropriate for the secant function itself or if alternative methods might be more suitable.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various approaches to the problem, including substitution methods and questioning the necessity of integration by parts for this integral. There is no explicit consensus on the best method yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are exploring different techniques and assumptions about the integration of sec(x), with some noting that integrating odd powers of sec(x) by parts is more common than integrating sec(x) itself.

Ginny Mac
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Integration by parts...

I just started Calc. II and though I struggle a bit, it's fascinating. I have been fooling with a problem lately...one of those standard problems that professors like to assign, and it usually appears in calculus texts:

Have ya'll ever done integration by parts with secx? A friend of mine worked it out for me, but I have had trouble reaching the solution on my own. Just thought I'd throw it out there in case ya'll hadn't run into it! It is a fun kind of headache.

-Gin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ginny,

I'm scooting this over to our Homework section.

Now, on to your question: Are you talking about integrands that contain powers of [itex]\sec(x)[/itex], or just the [itex]\sec(x)[/itex] itself? The reason I'm asking is that it is normal to integrate odd powers greater than 1 of the secant function by parts, but not so normal to integrate the secant function itself by parts.
 
That integral doesn't really require integration by parts... You have to mulitply by a form of one, which can be hard to see.

[tex]\int \sec{x}dx= \int \sec(x)*\frac{\sec(x)+\tan(x)}{\sec(x)+\tan(x)}dx[/tex]

You can do a u-substitution from there.
 
Or use the substitution [itex]t = \tan \left( {x/2} \right)[/itex]
 
Or [tex]\sec x = \frac{1}{{\cos x}}\left( {\frac{{\cos x}}{{\cos x}}} \right) = \frac{{\cos x}}{{\cos ^2 x}} = \frac{{\cos x}}{{1 - \sin ^2 x}}[/tex] and use substitution + partial fractions. It's one of the longer ways of doing it but it is an alternative. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
17K