asdf1
- 734
- 0
How do you prove that (1/2)*(gamma)mv^2 doen't equal the kinetic energy of a particle moving at relativistic speeds?
The discussion centers on the proof regarding the relativistic kinetic energy of a particle, specifically addressing the expression (1/2)*(gamma)mv^2 and its validity at relativistic speeds. Participants explore the definitions and implications of kinetic energy in the context of special relativity.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the expression (1/2)*(gamma)mv^2 for relativistic kinetic energy. There are competing views regarding the concept of mass and its relationship to velocity, with some advocating for invariant mass and others for relativistic mass.
Participants reference different interpretations of mass and kinetic energy without resolving the underlying assumptions or definitions. The discussion highlights the complexity of the topic and the varying perspectives on relativistic concepts.
... yet another example why relativistic mass was a bad idea.asdf1 said:How do you prove that (1/2)*(gamma)mv^2 doen't equal the kinetic energy of a particle moving at relativistic speeds?
This question has absolutely nothing to do with the great idea of relativistic mass.Trilairian said:... yet another example why relativistic mass was a bad idea.
Mass doesn't change with speed.
[tex]E_{K} = (\gamma -1)mc^{2}[/tex]