How to relate relativistic kinetic energy and momentum

In summary, the conversation discusses solving a special relativity problem involving the graph representation of relativistic momentum as a function of relativistic kinetic energy. The participants suggest using equations for momentum and kinetic energy, but an additional equation relating gamma and velocity is needed. This leads to the conclusion that the correct graph is either C or D, with the final equation being p(K) = (1/c)√[K(K+2E0)].
  • #1
greg_rack
Gold Member
363
79
Hi guys,

a special relativity problem requested to choose the right graph representing relativistic momentum ##p## as a function of rel. kinetic energy ##K##, from these four:
IMG_C89C1901D709-1.jpeg
At first, I tried writing ##p## as a function of ##K##, in order to then analyze the function's graph and see if it matches one of the four above, being ##p=\gamma mv## and ##K=mc^2(\gamma - 1)##, but I couldn't rearrange those two in such a way.
By deduction, I believe the graph should be C or D, since momentum would reasonably tend to infinity in a non-linear way(A) due to the presence of factor ##\gamma##, nor as indicated by B...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You have an equation for ##p(\gamma, v)## and an equation for ##K(\gamma)##, so of course, you cannot use them to find an equation ##p(K)##, you need an extra equation, do you know of any equation that relates ##\gamma## and ##v##?
 
  • #3
Gaussian97 said:
You have an equation for ##p(\gamma, v)## and an equation for ##K(\gamma)##, so of course, you cannot use them to find an equation ##p(K)##, you need an extra equation, do you know of any equation that relates ##\gamma## and ##v##?
Aren't ##\gamma## and ##v## simply related by ##\gamma##'s definition ##\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta ^2}}##, being ##\beta## the velocity in terms of ##c##?
 
  • #4
greg_rack said:
Aren't ##\gamma## and ##v## simply related by ##\gamma##'s definition ##\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta ^2}}##, being ##\beta## the velocity in terms of ##c##?
Yes. So you should be able to write ##p(v)## and ##K(v)## and hence ##K(p)##.

Alternatively, do you know anything about ##E^2## and ##p^2c^2##?
 
  • Like
Likes greg_rack
  • #5
Ibix said:
Alternatively, do you know anything about ##E^2## and ##p^2c^2##?
Yes, ##E^2=p^2c^2+m^2c^{4}##.
Rearranging, it indeed gets ##p(E)=\frac{1}{c}\sqrt{E^2-E_0^2}##, hence:
$$p(K)=\frac{1}{c}\sqrt{K(K+2E_0)}$$
which corresponds to graph C :)
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and PeroK

1. What is the equation for relativistic kinetic energy?

The equation for relativistic kinetic energy is E = (mc^2)/sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2)), where E is the energy, m is the mass of the object, c is the speed of light, and v is the velocity of the object.

2. How does relativistic kinetic energy differ from classical kinetic energy?

Relativistic kinetic energy takes into account the effects of special relativity, such as time dilation and length contraction, on the energy of a moving object. This results in a more accurate calculation of the energy of an object at high velocities compared to the classical kinetic energy equation, which only applies to objects moving at non-relativistic speeds.

3. How is momentum related to relativistic kinetic energy?

Momentum is related to relativistic kinetic energy through the equation p = mv/sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2)), where p is the momentum of the object, m is the mass, v is the velocity, and c is the speed of light. This equation shows that as the velocity of an object approaches the speed of light, the momentum and relativistic kinetic energy both increase significantly.

4. Can relativistic kinetic energy be negative?

Yes, relativistic kinetic energy can be negative. This can occur when the velocity of an object is greater than the speed of light, resulting in an imaginary number for the energy. However, this is not physically possible as nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.

5. How is relativistic kinetic energy used in practical applications?

Relativistic kinetic energy is used in many practical applications, such as in particle accelerators and nuclear reactors. It is also important in the field of astrophysics for understanding the energy and dynamics of objects moving at high velocities, such as stars and galaxies.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
2K
Back
Top