Elastic Collision of Point Mass and Dumbell: Analyzing Kinetic Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of an elastic collision between a point mass M and a dumbbell composed of two masses of M/2. The point mass strikes the dumbbell, which is initially stationary, resulting in the dumbbell moving to the right at velocity V post-collision. The key conclusion is that the original mass does not come to rest; instead, it retains some momentum, and the collision dynamics depend on the point of impact on the dumbbell. The analysis requires applying conservation of momentum, angular momentum, and kinetic energy to fully understand the outcome of the collision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic collisions in physics
  • Knowledge of conservation laws: momentum and energy
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics and angular momentum
  • Basic principles of kinetic energy calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of elastic collisions in multi-body systems
  • Learn about conservation of angular momentum in collisions
  • Explore kinetic energy distribution in rotational systems
  • Investigate the effects of impact points on collision outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the mechanics of collisions, particularly those involving rotational dynamics and energy conservation principles.

daveed
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Say we have a point mass [tex]M[/tex] traveling to the right at velocity [tex]V[/tex]. It strikes a dumbell composed of two masses of [tex]M/2[/tex] separated by a massless rod of length [tex]L[/tex]. The collision is elastic.

I am having some trouble thinking about this...

After the collision, the original mass is stationary because the dumbell has the same mass, so that ends up going at [tex]V[/tex] towards the right.

However, it also starts spinning, and has a certain kinetic energy. But if the dumbell is moving to the right at [tex]V[/tex], it would have the same translational kinetic energy as the original mass. So the rotational kinetic energy would be extra, and therefor something has gone horribly wrong in my analysis.

Is my assumption that the original mass stop moving incorrect? This holds true for regular, point masses colliding(ie. billiards balls), but I guess it wouldn't be for systems with rotational parts. Because to have an elastic collision means only to have kinetic energy conserved, I suppose that the original mass retains some of its momentum to the right, and gives the dumbell some, and I have to solve for the velocities/angular velocities such that the total energy in the system is conserved. Is this the right analysis of the system?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use lower case "t" in tex.
 
The result of the collision depends on where the incoming mass strikes the dumbell. If it were to hit the dumbell exactly in the middle then the incoming mass would come to rest just like in the point particle case. If it hits one of the balls of the dumbell then it won't come to rest. Solve the problem by applying conservation of momentum, angular momentum, and energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K