Electric Potential Energy & Acceleration of 2 Metal Spheres

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tony11235
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the electric potential energy and acceleration of two charged metal spheres, A and B, with masses of 5g and 10g, respectively, both carrying a charge of 5 microCoulombs. The spheres are connected by a massless nonconducting string, and upon cutting the string, the acceleration of each sphere is determined by their respective masses and the electric force acting between them. After a long time, the speed of each sphere can be calculated using conservation of momentum principles, as the electric potential energy changes once the string is severed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential energy calculations
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with conservation of momentum
  • Basic principles of electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate electric potential energy for charged systems
  • Explore Newton's second law in the context of charged particles
  • Study conservation of momentum in multi-body systems
  • Investigate the effects of electric forces on motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in electrostatics and dynamics of charged particles.

Tony11235
Messages
254
Reaction score
0
Two tiny metal spheres A and B of mass 5g and 10g have equal positive charge q = 5 microCoulombs. The spheres are connected by a massless nonconducting string of length 1 m, which is much greater than the radii of the spheres. What is the electric potenial energy of the system? Suppose you cut the string. At that instant what is the acceleration of each sphere? A long time after you cut the string, what is the speed of each sphere?

Ok the first two questions are easy, no problem, but I'm hesitating on the last one. I'm not sure what to do. Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the Electric PE "a long time" after cutting it?
How could it be different than it was originally?
Or are you forgetting momentum conservation?
 
Got it. Thanks. What was I thinking.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K