Calculating Time for a Simple Pendulum

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for a simple pendulum to reach its lowest point when released from a horizontal position. Participants explore the relationship between the pendulum's motion, velocity, and time, considering both theoretical and practical aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a problem involving a simple pendulum and seeks to determine the time to reach the lowest point as a function of the radius R.
  • Another participant suggests separating variables and integrating to find time, indicating a method to derive the relationship between velocity and time.
  • A different participant proposes using the total mechanical energy balance and the definition of velocity, hinting at the complexity of the integration involved.
  • One participant discusses the equation of motion for a simple pendulum and provides a derivation involving angular speed, noting that the integration leads to elliptic integrals, which can only be solved numerically.
  • Another participant shares a link to an accurate formula for the period of a simple pendulum in the non-small angle regime, suggesting alternative resources for further exploration.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the quality of published work related to elliptic integrals, suggesting that there are better approximations available than those presented in the shared reference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the methods to approach the problem, with some advocating for numerical solutions involving elliptic integrals while others suggest alternative analytical methods. There is no consensus on the best approach or the validity of the referenced material.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the integration required to solve the problem leads to elliptic integrals, which complicates the analysis. There are also references to the limitations of existing approximations and the quality of published work in the field.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying pendulum dynamics, mathematical physics, or anyone exploring the complexities of motion in oscillatory systems.

ursubaloo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Consider the following problem: (this isn't homework, I thought this problem up myself and I'm wondering how to do it)

-------------------------------------
You have a simple pendulum of mass M and a radius R, which is released from the horizontal. How much time does it take to reach the lowest point, as a function of R?
-------------------------------------

It's easy to find the velocity as a function of the angle, but I couldn't figure out a way to factor time into it. There is also an approximation of the period of an osscilating pendulum which is equal to 2pi*root(L/g), but that holds only for small angle values.
So how do you do it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's easy to find the velocity as a function of the angle, but I couldn't figure out a way to factor time into it.

v=dx/dt-> just separate and integrate.
 
Write the total mechanical energy balance and then use the definition of velocity.

Daniel.

P.S.It's an elliptic integral of the first kind at the end.
 
The equation of motion for a simple pendulum is
[tex]\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}= -(g/l) sin(\theta)[/tex].
Since t does not appear explicitely, if we let [itex]\omega[/itex] be the angular speed, we can convert this to
[tex]\omega\frac{d\omega}{d\theta}= -(g/l) sin(\theta)[/tex]
[tex]\omega d\omega= -(g/l) sin(\theta)d\theta[/tex]
which can be integrated to give
[tex]\omega^2= (2m/l) cos(\theta)+ C[/tex]
Taking [itex]\theta= \frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] when [itex]\omega= 0[/itex]
(releasing the pendulum from rest at the horizontal), we get
[tex]\omega^2= (2m/)(cos(\theta)- 1)[/tex]
I presume that is what ursubaloo meant saying "It's easy to find the velocity as a function of the angle".

brentd49 is correct saying "just separate and integrate", except for the word "just". As dextercioby said, that's an elliptic integral and can only be done numerically.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's unbelieveble that there are people nowadays which don't use latex when writing an article & post it on "arxiv"... :

Daniel.
 
It's also sometimes unbelievable the feeble stuff some people publish. Elliptic integrals have been investigated for over a 100 years, and many approximations superior to the one given in this reference have been worked out. All they had to do was look.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K