Proving Identities with 0 < a in R

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nusc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    identities
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving mathematical identities involving exponentiation, specifically for the case where \(0 < a\) in the real numbers. Participants are exploring the properties of exponents and their definitions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are discussing various definitions of exponentiation, including \(a^x := \exp(x \cdot \log(a))\) and the implications of these definitions for proving the identities. Some suggest using the properties of the exponential function to derive the results.

Discussion Status

There are multiple lines of reasoning being explored, with some participants providing hints and suggestions for approaching the proofs. While some have expressed uncertainty about the second identity, others are attempting to connect the two identities through their definitions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the techniques for proving these identities may vary depending on the class context, suggesting that different definitions or approaches might be more appropriate in different educational settings.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
How do you prove these?
Let 0 < a, an element of R, and x, y an element of R. Then:
(a^x)(a^y) = (a^(x+y))
a^(-x) = 1/(a^x)
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A hint before midnight would be great!
 
Or maybe they are not so simple?
 
what class is this for? There is prolly many ways to prove this but some of the techniques might not be appropriate for all classes.

how about write
(aaaaa...a)(aaaaaaa...a) so we have a times itself x+y times
...x times... y times

=a^(x+y)
 
Last edited:
for the second part start with a^(-x) and multiply by a well placed 1.
Since 1(anything)=anything
so try multiplying by 1 where your 1= (a^x)/(a^x)
 
Nusc said:
How do you prove these?
Let 0 < a, an element of R, and x, y an element of R. Then:
(a^x)(a^y) = (a^(x+y))
a^(-x) = 1/(a^x)
Thanks.
The second follows easily from the first by the case y=-x
To handle the first you need to consider the definition you are using for a^x
for instance one possible definition is
a^x:=exp(x*log(a))
in which case the problem is reduced to showing
exp(x+y)=exp(x)*exp(y)
for this one must considerthe definition of exp(x)
one possible definition being
exp(x) is the unique function for which
exp(x) is a real number if x is a real numberjk
exp(x)*exp(y)=exp(x+y) if x and y are real numbers
limit x->0 [exp(x)-1]/x=1
This is a nice definition for this problem, of course if other definitions are used you will need to prove your statement other ways.
The other common definition of a^x is to let a^x be defined for rational numbers r then
a^x:=lim n->infinity a^r_n
where r_n is a rational sequence for which
lim n->infinity r_n=x
it is also possible to stay with
a^x:=exp(x*log(a))
and use other definitions for exp and log
 
(a^x)(a^y) = exp(x*ln(a))exp(y*ln(a)) = exp((x+y)*ln(a)) = exp(ln(a)^(x+y)) = a ^ (x+y)

Okay there. Now the second one?

exp(-x*ln(a)) = exp(ln(a)^-x) = a ^-x = 1/a^x

I'm not too sure about the second one...
 
Last edited:
Nusc said:
(a^x)(a^y) = exp(x*ln(a))exp(y*ln(a)) = exp((x+y)*ln(a)) = exp(ln(a)^(x+y)) = a ^ (x+y)
Okay there. Now the second one?
exp(-x*ln(a)) = exp(ln(a)^-x) = a ^-x = 1/a^x
I'm not too sure about the second one...
The second is a special case of the first
a^x*a^-x=a^(x+(-x))=a^(x-x)=a^0=1
hence
a^-x-1/a^x
just remember what is needed to rigorize this
1)take as a definition
a^x:=exp(x*log(a))
2)show that definition is equivalent other definitions if needed
3)define exp and log as desired
4)show these definitions are equivalent other definitions if needed
5)show that exp(x+y)=exp(x)*exp(y)
6)show that 5 and 1 together can be used to prove the desired result
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K