Genetically Engineered Water Hyacinth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SkepticJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of genetically engineering water hyacinths (Eichhornia crassipes) to thrive in saltwater environments and produce vegetable oil instead of gas in their lift bladders. Participants explore the feasibility, implications, and potential risks associated with this idea, touching on themes of energy production, ecological impact, and genetic modification.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that genetically engineered water hyacinths could serve as a renewable energy source by producing vegetable oil, questioning the timeline for such genetic modifications to be feasible.
  • Another participant challenges the practicality of filling the plant's bladders with oil, suggesting that oil is typically extracted from seeds and expressing concerns about introducing a rapidly growing species into a new habitat.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that genetic engineering has successfully produced other modified organisms, suggesting that it may be possible to direct oil production to the float bladders of water hyacinths.
  • Concerns are raised about the invasive nature of water hyacinths and the potential ecological consequences of introducing them to saltwater environments, including clogging water intake lines and disrupting local ecosystems.
  • Some participants discuss the logistics of harvesting these engineered plants, proposing methods for collection and utilization of the oil, while others express skepticism about the feasibility of controlling their spread in the ocean.
  • Questions are posed regarding the specific genetic modifications needed and the long-term sustainability of such a project, including potential abandonment if better energy sources emerge.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the viability or safety of genetically engineering water hyacinths for oil production. Concerns about ecological impact and the practicality of the proposal are contested by those who see potential benefits.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the challenges of controlling invasive species in marine environments and the complexities of genetic engineering, including the need for specific genetic modifications and the risks associated with introducing new organisms into existing ecosystems.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may interest individuals involved in genetic engineering, environmental science, renewable energy, and ecological management, as well as those concerned with the implications of introducing genetically modified organisms into new habitats.

SkepticJ
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
I had an idea a number of months back as a, at least partial, source of energy we humans could tap. Solar energy. Already been thought of I know, but not like this. Genetically engineer the aquatic plants called water hyacinths(Eichhornia crassipes) to be capable of growing in salt water and instead of filling their lift bladders with gas, they fill them with vegetable oil; another spliced in trait.
Water hyacinths are blights in fresh water, they'd be blights in the ocean as well; if they weren't harvested for the oil. But they would be, that's the whole point. They can double their numbers in two weeks. The vegetable oil version wouldn't be capable of this, likely, due to the amount of energy that would need to go into synthesizing the large amounts of oil. However, giant hyacinth mats, hundreds of thousands of square kilometers in area, in the Pacific ocean between the Tropic of Capricorn and Cancer, would clean up, so to speak, in their growth rate.
My first is, how soon is such genetic control going to be possible,i.e. when can such plants be created?
Second question, what kind of idea is this, insane to try?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Oil is extracted from the seeds of plants. It seems like a very long stretch to fill bladders with it. You should check out the thread in politics on GMO plants to get an idea of the risks of introducing a species, especially a rapidly growing species, into a novel habitat without a plan to control it.
 
Moonbear said:
Oil is extracted from the seeds of plants. It seems like a very long stretch to fill bladders with it. You should check out the thread in politics on GMO plants to get an idea of the risks of introducing a species, especially a rapidly growing species, into a novel habitat without a plan to control it.

Aye.
Why? Bacteria have created human insulin since the 80s. Glow in the dark plants, have a gene from fireflies, exist already. A gene(s) must control where the oil is and isn't formed. Why in the seeds but no place else? Genetics. Why don't humans have nerve cells that can feel pain in our brains? Genetics. Simply put the oil gene(s) to where they dump their oil production in the float bladders. The bladders would still function as floatation, because oil is lighter than water.


Ok. Scooping it up with ocean skimmer ships and burning the vegetable oil as fuel, converting it into synthetic petrol or making bioplastics from their oil seems like an effective control to me. The plant's bodies themselves could be burned, used to create synthetic petrol, mulched and sprayed back into the ocean to rot and provide nutrients for the next generation of oil hyacinths etc. etc. etc. You see, I've put many hours of thought into my pet idea?
 
SkepticJ said:
Ok. Scooping it up with ocean skimmer ships ...
In the meantime, it clogs water intake lines on ships used for cooling the engines and tangles up the propellers, invades entire marinas and the related ecosystems, chokes out sunlight reaching the photosynthetic organisms beneath the surface, killing the fish that feed on them below that, contaminates the water with oil changing the surface tension properties so the poor duckies don't float anymore, not to mention the mess on the beaches. The first hurricane comes through, and the plants are strewn throughout the seas of the world. :rolleyes: Ocean habitats are really hard to maintain any control over. If you have a species that you already know is invasive, it makes no sense at all to do something to adapt it to yet another environment.

I can't recall the name of the plant...some sort of seaweed...that's currently a problem in the Mediterranean around Italy. It escaped from aquariums, just a few plants getting flushed into the wild have completely taken over the aquatic ecosystem in the area.
Okay, here it is...
http://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/hcd/caulerpa/factsheet203.htm
http://www.cabi-bioscience.ch/wwwgisp/gtc2cs5.htm

Apparently it is also now in the wild in the coastal waters of Australia and California.

There are plenty more sites on it too if you want to learn more about the devastation that can be caused by one invasive species taking over a habitat.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Moonbear said:
In the meantime, it clogs water intake lines on ships used for cooling the engines and tangles up the propellers, invades entire marinas and the related ecosystems, chokes out sunlight reaching the photosynthetic organisms beneath the surface, killing the fish that feed on them below that, contaminates the water with oil changing the surface tension properties so the poor duckies don't float anymore, not to mention the mess on the beaches. The first hurricane comes through, and the plants are strewn throughout the seas of the world. :rolleyes: Ocean habitats are really hard to maintain any control over. If you have a species that you already know is invasive, it makes no sense at all to do something to adapt it to yet another environment.
I can't recall the name of the plant...some sort of seaweed...that's currently a problem in the Mediterranean around Italy. It escaped from aquariums, just a few plants getting flushed into the wild have completely taken over the aquatic ecosystem in the area.
Okay, here it is...
http://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/hcd/caulerpa/factsheet203.htm
http://www.cabi-bioscience.ch/wwwgisp/gtc2cs5.htm
Apparently it is also now in the wild in the coastal waters of Australia and California.
There are plenty more sites on it too if you want to learn more about the devastation that can be caused by one invasive species taking over a habitat.


Couldn't the water intake lines be, um, far below the water line? These plants float, they're not like seaweed.
Tangle up props? I admit a small dingy boat's prop would get tangled up; but an ocean ship's? Their props are the size of some building's rooms, are below the water line and are spun using engines with thousands of horsepower. I'm sorry, but I just don't see tangled props being a problem.
It would block the sunlight, that's why it would be kept in check by rabid harvesting.
Oil leaking wouldn't be as bad as you think. It's vegetable oil, not petroleum, so it'd be biodegradable. How would the oil get out anyway? It's in a fluid tight bladder. Are animals going to come along and poke holes in billions of float bladders?:confused:
Maybe all the better then? That much more crop avalable to harvest.

It does if you have a use for it. True, it wouldn't make sense to adapt normal hyacinths to salt water, because we humans have little use for them other than animal feed. A crop that catches solar energy and stores it in high energy density form isn't a worthless plant.
I know all about invasive species, these would be different for several reasons. The aforementioned reason we have for harvesting them; what reason would we have to harvest the seaweed blight that you mention? Second reason is they're surface plants, so are easy to gather up. You know about garbage skimming ships, with the conveyer belt on the front? Well, imagine a giant oil tanker sized ships with a giant skimmer belt on the front, perhaps some on the sides as well. The ships cruise the oceans skimming, masticating and filtering out the oil from the plant slurry. Then they bring their energy load to countries' ports.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So, specifically, what genes are you going to splice in, and where?

As for harvesting, they are harvesting that seaweed blight as fast as possible, just to keep it under control so it doesn't continue spreading. It's a losing battle; it only takes a few tiny plants to escape to create that sort of infestation. How do you plan to keep them contained? What happens when another, better form of energy comes along and nobody is interested in harvesting them anymore? Why introduce them to a salt water habitat at all? You're talking about not clogging props on large ships...are you planning on growing these in shipping channels? :bugeye:

This sounds like a very poorly thought out plan that's nothing more than fantasy. You make it sound like someone can just pop a gene into a plant for some completely different function than that plant normally performs, in a way that the gene doesn't even function in the native plant. Beyond that, you have no plan for biocontainment...in fact, your whole premise is that you will release it into the wild to breed unrestricted.

What's wrong with using vegetables to produce vegetable oil anyway?
 
Let's just forget for now about the huge task of the genetic alteration and focus on containment. There is little hope for this project if you just say "we'll let it loose and see what happens". Perhaps if you took a page from freshwater aquaculture and proposed to do it in large controllable ponds that you manage at a facility, it might fly. You'll probably end up with better overall yield, you won't have to worry about the whole conversion to saltwater thing, and you consolidate your footprint and reduce transport costs by building the processing plant in the same location.

You could also potentially reap other benefits from surrounding industry, warm water effluent (nuclear plants) could be reclaimed and used to extend/accelerate growing seasons, sewage or "contaminated" wastewater could be bio-remediated through you plant system. You're letting too much out of your control with your current idea and would benefit greatly from a more real-world management scheme.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
13K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
10K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
26K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K