What is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function at T=0K?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Fermi-Dirac distribution function and its behavior at absolute zero temperature (T=0K). Participants are exploring how to demonstrate the functional form of the distribution at this temperature.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the implications of T approaching zero in the Fermi-Dirac equation, particularly questioning how to show the function's form at T=0K. Some participants suggest that the limits of the function have already been demonstrated, while others express confusion about the requirement to "show" the form mathematically.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing insights into the definition of the Fermi-level and its implications for the distribution function at T=0K. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the necessity of further mathematical demonstration.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of an attachment that presumably illustrates the desired functional form of the Fermi-Dirac distribution at T=0K, though its content is not described in the discussion. The conversation reflects a lack of consensus on the clarity of the original question and the sufficiency of the provided reasoning.

tyco05
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
Hey kids,

The question I'm having trouble with (this time) is as follows:

Show that the Fermi-Dirac distribution function,

[tex]f_{FD}(E)=\frac{1}{e^{(\frac{E-E_f}{kT})}+1}[/tex]

Has the following functional form at T= 0K
(see attachment)


Now, the first thing that screamed at me was the division by T in the exponential bit. If T=0, what is going on!?

The obvious things are:

E>Ef then f(E) = 0

and

E<Ef then f(E) = 1.

I'm just really confused at how I can show that the function has that form at T=0K

Any ideas?

Cheers
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your question. Didn't you just show the function has that form?
[tex]\lim_{T \rightarrow 0}f_{FD}(E)=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll}1 & \mbox{if} E<E_f\\ \frac{1}{2} & \mbox{if} E=E_f \\0 & \mbox{if} E>E_f[/tex]
 
I'm glad somebody else doesn't understand the question either.

They want me to 'show' that the distribution has the (attached pic) form at T=0.

The real problem I'm having is how do I "show" that it has that form? Via two lines of maths? That's it?
 
You HAVE just shown it. By taking the limits.
So yeah, that's it. :)
 
Well, just use the definition of the Fermi-level... It is the the maximum energy-level at T = 0 K. Just fill up all the available energy-levels with all available electrons. The last electron is placed at the highest energylevel which is called the Fermi-level. Ofcourse all this is done at zero Kelvin. That is why the distribution function has the drawn form. All levels are filled up (probability one) till the Fermi-level. Above this level there are no filled levels since the Fermi-level is the highest. It is just by QM-definition of the Fermi-level


regards
marlon
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K