Nuclear physics Pions and Parity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interaction of pions and deuterium in the reaction \(\pi^- + d \rightarrow n + n + \pi^0\) and the implications of parity conservation. The user initially struggles with the parity values, noting that the parity eigenvalues do not match, specifically \(-1 \neq 1\). Ultimately, they resolve the issue by recognizing that additional angular momentum on the left-hand side of the equation can flip parity, thus conserving it in the reaction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear physics concepts, specifically pions and deuterium.
  • Knowledge of parity conservation in particle interactions.
  • Familiarity with angular momentum and its role in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of fermion statistics, particularly regarding identical particles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of parity conservation in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the role of angular momentum in particle physics, focusing on its effects on parity.
  • Research pion interactions and their significance in nuclear reactions.
  • Examine the properties of identical fermions and their implications in particle physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in nuclear physics, particularly those interested in particle interactions and quantum mechanics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of parity and angular momentum in particle reactions.

Davorak
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
Nuclear physics Pions and Parity? Ignore, nevermind

Why can:
[tex] \pi^- + d \rightarrow n + n + \pi^0[/tex]
not happen for pions at rest?

work so far:
[tex] \begin{array}<br /> {|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline&\pi^-&d&\rightarrow &n \ + \ n&\pi^0\\\hline{Spin}&0&1&\<br /> \rightarrow &1/2 \ 1/2&0\\\hline{J}&0&1&\rightarrow &L + \<br /> S&0\\\hline{Parity}&-1&1&\rightarrow &(-1)^{S+L+1}&-1\\\hline<br /> \end{array}[/tex]
d is deuterium
S+L for the nuetron pair must be even since they are identical fermions
Partity egeinvalues -1 != 1
I think the Paritiy inequality is the key, but i can not make the connection with a physical law.
Any help would be nice, Thanks

Edit: never mind I figuared it out. Aditional angular momentum on the left hand side will flip parity(l=1,3,5...), making parity conserved again. Thanks anyway
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
.

Thank you for sharing your thought process and solution. It is great to see that you were able to figure it out on your own. Keep up the good work!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K