Is There a Gauss' Law for Gravitation?

AI Thread Summary
There is a Gauss's law for gravitation, expressed as Φ = 4πG * Menclosed, which parallels the electric version. For magnetic fields, Gauss's law exists as part of Maxwell's Equations, stating that the net magnetic flux through a closed surface is zero, indicating the absence of magnetic monopoles. Magnetic field lines can intersect only at points where the field strength is zero, leading to questions about the existence of magnetic monopoles. Current theories, including those referenced in introductory physics textbooks, suggest that magnetic monopoles might exist, but none have been discovered. The inclusion of magnetic charge in Maxwell's equations introduces symmetry but creates inconsistencies with magnetic potential.
aniketp
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
hello,
I was wondering if there is an equivalent gauss' law for gravitation like:
\Phi=4\piG*Menclosed
any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Absolutely. See: "[URL law for gravity[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thank you. but do magnetic fields have any such law? intuitively, i am inclined to say no,
because magnetic field lines can cross...but i would like a rigorous proof
 
aniketp said:
but do magnetic fields have any such law? intuitively, i am inclined to say no,
because magnetic field lines can cross...but i would like a rigorous proof
Yes, there's a Gauss's law for magnetic fields--it's one of Maxwell's Equations. Since there are no magnetic monopoles, it is rather simple: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss%27_law_for_magnetism" .

Magnetic field lines can cross only where the field is zero.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm curious as to why there isn't any magnetic monopoles. The freshman physics textbook I read for my intro physics course says that current theory (I think it was Serway) does predict the existence of magnetic monopoles.
 
No one seems to have found any magnetic monopoles. By including magnetic charge and magnetic current terms in Maxwell's equations you postulate magnetic charge. It brings some (anti-) symmetry to the equations, but this is inconsistence with the magnetic potential.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top