View Single Post
tiny-tim
#2
Mar5-09, 07:38 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
tiny-tim's Avatar
P: 26,157
Hi physics120!
Quote Quote by physics120 View Post
Momentum conservation requires (m1 + m2) * vf = m1v1 +m2v2. Because v1>v2, it must be that (m1 +m2) * vf = m1v1 + m2v2 > m1v2 +m2v2 = (m1 + m2) * v2. Thus vf > v2. Similarly, v2 < v1 so (m1 + m2) * vf = m1v1 + m2v2 < m1v1 + m2v1 = (m1 + m2) * v1. Thus vf < v1. The collision causes m1 to slow down and m2 to speed up.
hmm works even if v1 < v2

personally, I'd write it vf = pv1 + (1-p)v2,

where p = m1/(m1 + m2),

and then obviously vf lies between v1 and v2.
but anyway, what part of the proof in the book is worrying you?