Have you taken a course in "how to be an effective agent provocateur", by any chance? I consider your comments disingenuous. You surely must have read, prior to your above comments in #30 (entry timestamp: 03:30 PM), my own clear statement in #28 (entry timestamp: 12:54 PM)
"I entirely meant shell matter's contribution to the exterior, SM region, and said so explicitly in #25."
capable of discerning the fundamental significance of replacing 'in' with 'to' in your above distortion of what I was on about in #25, right?
Will have more to say on that claim in responding to your #35