Time derivative of creation/annhilation operators

pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Basically is it possible to take a time derivative of a creation/annhilation operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that's not possible. If you are talking about creation and annhilation operators usually found in QFT, they live in the momentum space, so they don't depend on x, but on p. However, I am not sure if in some other circumstances this could be possible.
 
yeah so for eample \frac{d \hat{a}}{dt} would =0 if a was the standard QFT annihilation op
 
Saying you cannot take the "time derivative" does NOT mean that derivative is 0. It means that the derivative does not exist at all.
 

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Is It Known For Sure Infinites In QFT Are Caused Using a Continuum?'

I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
View full post »
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'

Thread 'Lesser Green's function'

The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Numerical implementation of creation and annhilation operators in the SSH model
Replies
0
Views
749
I Quick question regarding creation/annihilation operators
Replies
1
Views
916
I Atoms in a harmonic oscillator and number states
Replies
5
Views
2K
A Confusion about creation/annihilation operators with interaction
Replies
1
Views
218
A Creation and annihilation operator
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Where does the QM creation operator get its energy?
Replies
29
Views
2K
B A stupidly basic question about expectation value
Replies
8
Views
2K
Why Do We Need Fields as Annihilation & Creation Operators?
Replies
17
Views
4K
I How to derive momentum operator in position basis via its definition?
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Time dependence of operators in the Schrödinger picture
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top