# Matlab vs mathematica

by Ai52487963
Tags: mathematica, matlab
 P: 115 I'm trying to have a math program on my computer for math-related things. I've been attempting to use matlab for a while now, but its far too confusing for my tastes. Is mathematica any easier to use?
 P: 39 like any program you will need to take time to get use to the notations but i found it to be easier than matlab. also mathematica has an extensive help library that you can use if you forget
 P: 329 Mathematica is easier to use. Like the Midy said, it'll take time to get use to the notation, but it's pretty good at telling you what you did wrong.
 Sci Advisor P: 2,751 Matlab vs mathematica Asking the question of matlab vs mathematica is a little like asking the question of which one should I choose between Microsoft Word 10 and Motocross Madness 2. The simple answer is that they are different programs intended for different purposes and not directly comparable. Mathematica is a algebra and symbolic maths package whereas matlab is predominately a numerical computation package (though you can get a symbolic toolkit for matlab which then gives it some of the features of a program like Maple or Mathematica). Generally speaking though you'd use Matlab if you want to be able to manipulate lots of numerical data easily and you'd use mathematica if you want an aid for symbolic mathematical manipulations. Engineers for example would mostly tend to find Matlab more useful than Mathematica, while it would normally be the other way around for a Mathematician.
 Emeritus Sci Advisor PF Gold P: 6,236 I use both, and as pointed out previously, they have different scopes of application. Matlab is much more efficient when it comes to intensive numerical calculation. However, I find Mathematica much richer, and even when I have to do not-too-intensive numerical work, I prefer Mathematica. But for the big number crunching, Mathematica is simply not efficient enough with computer ressources. Mathematica has however, a longer "learning curve" IMO. But once you master it, it is terribly powerful. If it is a matter of budget, I'd go for mathematica, because there's no clone available, while there are good free clones of matlab (scilab for instance).
Mentor
P: 15,065
 Quote by vanesch If it is a matter of budget, I'd go for mathematica, because there's no clone available, while there are good free clones of matlab (scilab for instance).
There is Maxima (SourceForge link), based on a 1982 version of Macsyma. Macysyma is the granddaddy of Mathematica and Maple. Sorry, I haven't tried it.

Matlab provides a symbolic toolkit powered by the Maple engine. Unfortunately, the integration is not clean (and that is saying it nicely). Do the Matlab clones provide a symbolic toolkit? To date I have not been impressed by the Matlab clones.
P: 487
 Quote by D H There is Maxima (SourceForge link), based on a 1982 version of Macsyma. Macysyma is the granddaddy of Mathematica and Maple. Sorry, I haven't tried it. Matlab provides a symbolic toolkit powered by the Maple engine. Unfortunately, the integration is not clean (and that is saying it nicely). Do the Matlab clones provide a symbolic toolkit? To date I have not been impressed by the Matlab clones.
I have tried maxima before. It does give you a feel of what symbolic package is. However it feature is nowhere near maple or mathematica. I personally prefer mathematica because it is TOO POWERFUL compare to anyhting else on earth
P: 2,047
 Quote by Chris Hillman SAGE is an open source initiative led by William Stein (Mathematics, University of Washington) and funded by various leading institutions in the mathematical sciences, but it is hugely ambitious so it always needs more developers! SAGE aims to ultimately provide a user interface comparable to Maple which enables users to run commands in Maple, Mathematica, MATLAB, MuPAD, Magma, Axiom, GAP, GP/PARI, Macaulay2, Maxima, Octave, and Singular, while freely using python scripts. See this page for a more complete list. As I understand it, there is some hope that development of SAGE might revive development of Maxima, which currently lags far behind Maple by virtue of lacking such powerful commands as casesplit and such useful packages as Groebner. I think this initiative is extremely promising; if it succeeds it will fundamentally alter how mathematicians work and play (for the better, I think). To mention just one point, working mathematicians are probably well aware, for example, of the desirability of facile checking of Mathematica and Maple results against each other. Anyone interested in making financial contributions or contributing to code can look here. I myself am unaffiliated with SAGE but I am seriously interested in trying to set up a "Sage Wiki" somewhat like Dispersive Wiki, with the goals of providing a discussion forum for SAGE developers around the world, providing tutorials for anyone interested in learning to use components of SAGE such as Maple, GAP, etc., promoting the project to the world at large. Note that SAGE-2.8.12 is available for installation and beta testing. (Confusingly, there is a well known physics experiment also called SAGE and also run at UW, and there is a well known grant program also called SAGE and also admininstered at UW. All three programs are distinct!) BTW, a relevant conference ("camp meeting"?) which starts tommorrow (!!!!) is here.
It has made it to /., so everyone will know about it now. The site and its mirrors are quite slow, so I haven't read much about it. If anyone's interested, I managed to reach to the download page (32-bit Linux).
 P: 67 When I'm working on maths I have Matlab, Mathematica, and Maple all going. It's hard to be quite proficient at all of them so I just use what I know from each. I like mathematica a lot, if I were to choose only one, because the documentation seems the most extensive and accessible. Just my $0.02  P: 1,875 I think it comes down to solely what you want Symbolic/Analytic - Mathematica Numerical - Matlab Don't get one or the other because one is easier to use, get it for the right purpose. People with programming experience would probably say Matlab is easier than Mathematica, while people without might have an easier time with Mathematica. Basically anything you would see in a course, such as Calculus, Linear Algebra, and others of the sort, you can use Mathematica for. But if you want to look at bifurcations of a nonlinear pendulum, for example, you don't (at least I don't) even want to look at Mathematica.  Sci Advisor P: 2,340 Hi, neutrino, thanks for the link, which led me to http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22768 The comments had me  Emeritus Sci Advisor PF Gold P: 10,429 Of course, we haven't even mentioned Mathcad, which is one of my personal favorites. It does almost anything that Mathematica does (at least in terms of what I need), it's pretty, and it's significantly easier to learn than Mathematica. - Warren  P: 67 holy crap! I just realized how expensive these programs are. @chroot thanks I'll try that out  Emeritus Sci Advisor PF Gold P: 10,429 Most of these programs have student editions that are reasonably priced (or about as "reasonable" as a textbook). - Warren  P: 7 mathematica rules. maple is garbage, just as an aside.  HW Helper P: 3,352 I've only ever used the trial of Mathematicia because my parents don't reckon its worth$150 :( It was definitely powerful, although because of the Nature of its computations, some symbolic expressions were more complicated than they needed to be. That can be said of any symbolic math program though.
P: 191
 Quote by chroot Most of these programs have student editions that are reasonably priced (or about as "reasonable" as a textbook). - Warren
Some of them are pretty asinine with their treatment of "Student Edition" licenses.

For instance, Wolfram donated a student edition of Mathematica 3.0 to a conference I presented at just after I finished my undergrad. My presentation took second or third place, and won the copy of Mathematica 3.0.

Which I then could not register, because (having graduated) I was no longer a student.

Which they balked at registering when I was a grad student, but had a T/A so I wasn't "full time" to them.

Which they assert I cannot use if I am not registered as a full time student.

So it sits, on a shelf, gathering dust.

ETA: I'd love to try Mathematica now, but even as a teacher and a grad student, I'm only eligible for the $1000 license, which is about 5% of my gross salary. I can't justify that when I have no exact pressing reason to need the software.$250 I could justify as a "toy".

Plus, I'm headed toward a primarily Linux home office...if I bought the Windows Mathematica, would they let me switch to Linux, or would I have to buy a new license?

 Related Discussions Math & Science Software 18 Math & Science Software 7 Math & Science Software 1 Math & Science Software 10 Math & Science Software 4