Register to reply 
Real Analysis  Radius of Convergence 
Share this thread: 
#1
Apr2908, 10:08 AM

P: 159

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Suppose that [tex]\sum[/tex]a_{n}x^{n} has finite radius of convergence R and that a_{n} >= 0 for all n. Show that if the series converges at R, then it also converges at R. 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution Since the series converges at R, then I know that [tex]\sum[/tex]a_{n}R^{n} = M. At R, the series is the following: [tex]\sum[/tex]a_{n}(R)^{n} = [tex]\sum[/tex](1)^{n}a_{n}R^{n}. I'm not sure where to go from here. I thought I needed to use the alternating series test, but how can I know that a1 >= a2 >= ... >= an for all n? Do I know this because the series converges? Thanks for your help. 


#2
Apr2908, 10:14 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,235

Right. You can't use the alternating series test. How about a comparison test?



#3
Apr2908, 10:30 AM

P: 159

Thanks! So since [tex]\sum[/tex]a_{n}R^{n} converges, and a_{n}(R)^{n} <= a_{n}R^{n} for all n, then [tex]\sum[/tex]a_{n}(R)^{n} converges.



#4
Apr2908, 10:32 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,235

Real Analysis  Radius of Convergence
Sorry! That's wrong. I'm clearly asleep at the wheel. That's convergence for sequences. And this sort of argument only shows that the partial sums are bounded, not that they converge. Do you know the Dirichlet convergence test?



#5
Apr2908, 11:19 AM

P: 159

Let [tex]\sum[/tex]a_{n} be a series where a_{n} >=0 for all n. (i) If [tex]\sum[/tex]a_{n} converges and b_{n} <= a_{n} for all n, then [tex]\sum[/tex]b_{n} converges. If I let a_{n} = a_{n}R^{n}, this is >=0 for all n. And if I let b_{n} = a_{n}(R)^{n}, then I have b_{n} <= a_{n} for all n, so the series converges, right? What's wrong with this statement? 


#6
Apr2908, 11:27 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,235

Nothing wrong with that. Unfortunately, I wasn't thinking of that comparison test. Hence the panic attack. Carry on.



#7
Apr2908, 11:28 AM

P: 159

Ok! Thanks once again for your help.



#8
Apr2908, 12:15 PM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,682

What's wrong with using the comparison test is that it only applies to positive series. Certainly n< (1/2)^{n} for all n, but we can't use that to conclude that [itex]\sum n [/itex] converges!
The crucial point is that every a_{n} is positive. That means that [itex]\sum a_n x^n[/itex], for x negative is an alternating series. What is true of alternating series? 


#9
Apr2908, 12:37 PM

P: 159




#10
Apr2908, 01:30 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,235




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Real Analysis proof help, convergence  Calculus & Beyond Homework  11  
Real Analysis  Uniform Convergence  Calculus & Beyond Homework  1  
Real Analysis least upper bound and convergence  General Math  4  
Real analysis Convergence/l.u.b  Calculus & Beyond Homework  5  
Radius of convergence  Calculus & Beyond Homework  4 