Register to reply 
Prove Euler Identity without using Euler Formula 
Share this thread: 
#1
Nov1408, 03:12 AM

P: 655

Is it possible to prove Euler's identity (e^i*pi = 1) without simply taking it as a special case of Euler's formula (e^i*x = cos(x) + i sin(x))?



#2
Nov1408, 04:21 AM

P: 4,512

You can derive Euler's equation by Taylor expanding e^ix.
Collecting the odd powers of x will give you the Taylor expansion of i sin(x). Collecting the even powers of x will give you the Taylor expansion of cos(x). Setting x=pi gets you what you want. 


#3
Nov1408, 04:37 AM

P: 655




#4
Nov1408, 04:59 AM

P: 4,512

Prove Euler Identity without using Euler Formula
never mind



#5
Nov1408, 05:01 AM

P: 655




#6
Nov1408, 09:51 PM

P: 4,512

Thanks for being so gracious. I scibbled out a few things.
It's a blunt approach, but if you can prove these two series converge... [tex]1  \frac{\pi^2}{2!} + \frac{\pi^4}{4!}  ... \rightarrow 1[/tex] and [tex]\pi  \frac{\pi^3}{3!} + \frac{\pi^5}{5!}  ... \rightarrow 0[/tex] 


#7
Nov1508, 01:08 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 9,470

this seems trivial: e^(x+y) = e^x e^y, so 1 = e^0 = e^ipi e^(ipi) = e^(ipi)/ e^ipi, oops, anything satisfies this.
well you could use the uniqueness theorem for diff eq's. or say that e^(inpi) = pooey. 


#8
Nov1508, 02:21 AM

P: 688

One question: how do you define the complex exponential, in the first place? (Without using Euler's formula).
If it is defined as a Taylor series, then there's no way but to start with one, I think. 


#9
Nov1508, 12:57 PM

P: 655




#10
Nov1508, 02:01 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 12,016




#11
Nov1508, 02:46 PM

P: 532

Using f(0)=1,f'=f its not hard to see that g(x)=exp(ix) gives a periodic function mapping R to S^{1}={x in C: x=1}. If its period is L then g(L/2)=1.
As pi is defined to be half the circumference of a unit circle in the Euclidean plane, then pi=L/2 follows almost by definition. 


#12
Nov1508, 02:55 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 2,020

How do you know that g(x)=1? And I'm not sure I see why g(L/2)=1 either.



#13
Nov1508, 03:08 PM

P: 532

[tex] \frac{d}{dx} g^2= \frac{d}{dx}(u^2+v^2)=2uu'+2vv'=2uv+2vu=0. [/tex] For, g(L/2)=1, it seems obvious to me that if you go half way round a unit circle centered at the origin and starting at (1,0) takes you to (1,0). With a bit of effort you can convert this to a rigorous argument. Alternatively, to make things easier you can use g(x+y)=g(x)g(y). If L is the period then g(L/2)^2=g(L)=g(0)=1, so g(L/2) is either 1 or 1. You can rule out g(L/2)=1, because that would imply that g has period L/2 or smaller. So, g(L/2)=1. 


#14
Nov1508, 03:16 PM

P: 655




#15
Nov1508, 03:50 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 2,020

And I actually don't buy that it's obvious that L/2=pi  at least not without knowing that e^ix=cosx+isinx. 


#16
Nov1508, 03:50 PM

P: 655

The result also shows g is unit speed. Take [itex]\frac{d}{dx}g'(x)^2 = \frac{d}{dx}g(x)^2 = 0[/itex] since g' = ig. Then g is a unit speed curve restricted to the unit circle.



#17
Nov1508, 03:57 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 2,020

I'm probably being especially dense... but so what?



#18
Nov1508, 04:02 PM

P: 655

We have that g is a unit speed parameterization of a simple closed curve of finite length. Isnt this sufficient to show that g is periodic and the period is the arc length of the curve?



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
How did Euler know this?  Differential Equations  16  
Is the EulerMclaurin sum formula valid for distributions ?  Calculus  0  
EulerMc laurin sum formula wit dilation.  Calculus  0  
Results same w/ Euler, Improved Euler, & RungeKutta  Differential Equations  14  
About an identity by Euler...  Linear & Abstract Algebra  3 