Working for NASA


by Stratosphere
Tags: nasa, working
Stratosphere
Stratosphere is offline
#1
May12-09, 02:32 PM
P: 360
Is it possible to be a theoretical physics and astrophysicist and still do independent research while working for NASA?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes
aerospaceut10
aerospaceut10 is offline
#2
May12-09, 05:12 PM
P: 139
If you have the willpower and work ethic to do it all, by all means.
orthovector
orthovector is offline
#3
May12-09, 05:22 PM
P: 115
lol, a theoretical physicist and astrophysicist while being productive at NASA....lol!!!!

unless you've got the brain of Enrico Fermi, that sounds reallllly tough. then again, I tend to think that I'm a theoretical and an astrophysicist. all i need to do is get a job at NASA.

Stratosphere
Stratosphere is offline
#4
May12-09, 05:29 PM
P: 360

Working for NASA


Quote Quote by orthovector View Post
lol, a theoretical physicist and astrophysicist while being productive at NASA....lol!!!!

unless you've got the brain of Enrico Fermi, that sounds reallllly tough. then again, I tend to think that I'm a theoretical and an astrophysicist. all i need to do is get a job at NASA.
From my studies so far I find that astrophysics isn't al that diffrent from normal physics, I know I could do both, I'm just not sure abought the NASA part.
aerospaceut10
aerospaceut10 is offline
#5
May12-09, 05:56 PM
P: 139
Quote Quote by Stratosphere View Post
From my studies so far I find that astrophysics isn't al that diffrent from normal physics, I know I could do both, I'm just not sure abought the NASA part.


Why's that?
klite
klite is offline
#6
May12-09, 08:09 PM
P: 23
To answer both your first question, and this one:
Quote Quote by Stratosphere View Post
From my studies so far I find that astrophysics isn't al that diffrent from normal physics, I know I could do both, I'm just not sure abought the NASA part.
Yes, you can work for NASA while being an astrophysicist/theoretical physicist. They employ people from a variety of professions, not just aerospace engineers and astronauts.

Look: http://astrophysics.gsfc.nasa.gov/
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/as...stronomer.html

Plus, if you are an astrophysicist, you can also become an astronaut, because they choose people from various professions, such as biologists, for example.
Quote Quote by orthovector View Post
lol, a theoretical physicist and astrophysicist while being productive at NASA....lol!!!!

unless you've got the brain of Enrico Fermi, that sounds reallllly tough. then again, I tend to think that I'm a theoretical and an astrophysicist. all i need to do is get a job at NASA.
As far as I know, there are a multitude of people with careers in theoretical physics and astrophysics. They don't all have the brain of Fermi, trust me.

I also want to be a theoretical physicist/astrophysicist, most likely going to work for NASA. I hope my answer helped you.
Stratosphere
Stratosphere is offline
#7
May12-09, 08:27 PM
P: 360
Quote Quote by klite View Post
To answer both your first question, and this one:


Yes, you can work for NASA while being an astrophysicist/theoretical physicist. They employ people from a variety of professions, not just aerospace engineers and astronauts.

Look: http://astrophysics.gsfc.nasa.gov/
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/as...stronomer.html

Plus, if you are an astrophysicist, you can also become an astronaut, because they choose people from various professions, such as biologists, for example.


As far as I know, there are a multitude of people with careers in theoretical physics and astrophysics. They don't all have the brain of Fermi, trust me.

I also want to be a theoretical physicist/astrophysicist, most likely going to work for NASA. I hope my answer helped you.
Maybe one day I will meet you.
orthovector
orthovector is offline
#8
May13-09, 02:24 AM
P: 115
Maybe one day I will meet you fine gentlemen also.
Andy Resnick
Andy Resnick is offline
#9
May13-09, 09:12 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,468
Quote Quote by Stratosphere View Post
Is it possible to be a theoretical physics and astrophysicist and still do independent research while working for NASA?
Having 'worked for' NASA in the past, may I offer the following perspective?

First, there are lots of ways one may 'work for' NASA. Being a civil servant (government employee), a contractor/subcontractor, a research grant recipient, etc.

Civil servant: The answer to your question is 'no'.
Contractor/subcontractor: The answer to your question is likely 'no'.
Research grant recipient: The answer to your question is possibly 'yes'.
Norman
Norman is offline
#10
May13-09, 12:00 PM
P: 922
Quote Quote by Andy Resnick View Post
Having 'worked for' NASA in the past, may I offer the following perspective?

First, there are lots of ways one may 'work for' NASA. Being a civil servant (government employee), a contractor/subcontractor, a research grant recipient, etc.

Civil servant: The answer to your question is 'no'.
Contractor/subcontractor: The answer to your question is likely 'no'.
Research grant recipient: The answer to your question is possibly 'yes'.
Andy has the gist of it but he is not completely correct either. I fall into the 3rd category listed above (Research grant recipient) and my grant allows my office to be housed within NASA. So, I am in close contact with civil servants, contractors and other grant recipients.

I have some colleagues and friends who are civil servants (who are also theoretical physicists, as am I) and they spend the vast majority of their time doing either bureaucratic work (paperwork, forms, meetings) or engineering. They do, however, fit in some basic science from time to time when the need arises and they have the time in their schedule to do it. How much of it depends on the person really. Typically, though, any major research project is granted out.
Stratosphere
Stratosphere is offline
#11
May13-09, 02:51 PM
P: 360
Quote Quote by Norman View Post
Andy has the gist of it but he is not completely correct either. I fall into the 3rd category listed above (Research grant recipient) and my grant allows my office to be housed within NASA. So, I am in close contact with civil servants, contractors and other grant recipients.

I have some colleagues and friends who are civil servants (who are also theoretical physicists, as am I) and they spend the vast majority of their time doing either bureaucratic work (paperwork, forms, meetings) or engineering. They do, however, fit in some basic science from time to time when the need arises and they have the time in their schedule to do it. How much of it depends on the person really. Typically, though, any major research project is granted out.
So as a theoretical physicist and astrophysicist what would I do working for NASA?
Andy Resnick
Andy Resnick is offline
#12
May13-09, 06:10 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,468
Novel propulsion schemes, exoplanet searches, human spaceflight issues (water management, radiation protection, dust, etc.). Stuff like that.
j93
j93 is offline
#13
May14-09, 02:26 PM
P: 286
Youre probably not going to be working on inflationary theory.
Stratosphere
Stratosphere is offline
#14
May14-09, 05:39 PM
P: 360
Would I need to be an observational astrophysist or a theoreticle astrophysics?
klite
klite is offline
#15
May14-09, 06:25 PM
P: 23
Quote Quote by Stratosphere View Post
Would I need to be an observational astrophysist or a theoreticle astrophysics?
It depends on what you like.

Observational Astrophysicists: extracts physical information from astronomical observations which can be directly compared with the models, and uses theoretical models to suggest unambiguous observational tests.

Theoretical Astrophysicists: use theoretical models and computer simulations to understand a variety of fundamental astrophysical phenomena such as: the formation and dynamics of planets in the solar system and around other stars, the physics of accretion flows and jets around black holes and neutron stars, the role of supermassive black holes in galaxy formation, the growth of the first stars and galaxy halos, the cosmic microwave background and ionization history of the universe, the nature of dark matter and dark energy, and the properties of the primordial seeds responsible for the growth of structure in the universe. (from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics).

If you are going for NASA, I'd say choose theoretical astrophysics, it's the one that encompasses more information, and objects that are further out in space. Personally, I like theoretical astrophysics more, but this is your choice.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
What is the best way to get a job as a physicist at NASA? Academic Guidance 3
not sure what I want to do with my life Academic Guidance 5
for NASA Aerospace Engineering 1
The probability of working for NASA Aerospace Engineering 1
work towards a job for nasa Academic Guidance 1