How Does Quantum Superposition Explain Probability in Wavefunctions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nick R
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superposition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the relationship between quantum superposition and probability in wavefunctions, specifically how the coefficients in a wavefunction's decomposition relate to the probability of measuring specific eigenvalues. The wavefunction is expressed as a linear combination of eigenfunctions, \psi = \sum_{n} a_{n}\psi_{n}, where the coefficients |a_{n}|^{2} represent the probability of obtaining the eigenvalue f_{n}. The orthogonality of eigenfunctions, defined by \int \psi^*_m(q) \psi_n(q) dq = 0 for m \ne n, is crucial for eliminating cross terms in the probability calculation, thereby confirming that \sum |a_{n}|^{2} = 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wavefunctions and their mathematical representation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenfunctions in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their properties
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics, particularly superposition and probability interpretation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of orthogonality in quantum mechanics and its implications for wavefunctions
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics, focusing on linear algebra applications
  • Learn about the Born rule and its role in interpreting probabilities in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of wavefunction collapse and measurement in quantum theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as mathematicians interested in the application of linear algebra to physical systems.

Nick R
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am brand new to this stuff and am trying to get my head around it all. I've spent considerable time trying to understand this from Landau's book on the subject (chapter 1 of course).

I bet I'd get more answers by being more brief but I always find that asking the problem carefully sometimes helps me understand the problem better.

A wavefunction, which completely describes the states of a quantum object, can be decomposed in terms of its eigenfunctions,

\psi = \sum_{n} a_{n}\psi_{n}

Eigenvalues (maybe a physical quantity) correspond to the eigenfunctions by

\widehat{f}\psi_{n} = f_{n}\psi_{n}

Where \widehat{f} is the operator that corresponds to the quantity in question.

From this, we see that the value of a_{n} for a given eigenfunction in the decomposition is (somehow) related to the "probability" that the physical quantity f has the value f_{n}.

Given, is

\int |\psi_{n}(q)|^{2}dq = 1

and

\int |\psi(q)|^{2}dq = 1

How does it follow that |a_{n}|^{2} is the probability of the physical quantity f having the value f_{n}? The reasoning presented in the book is not clear to me - it is a sort of deductive reasoning that seems like guesswork.

Of course if this is a probability then,

\sum |a_{n}|^{2} = 1

I don't understand how this follows from the other things.

Here is why I am having a problem with this:

I can see it all works if the following is true:

\psi = a_{0}\psi_{0} + a_{1}\psi_{1} + ... + a_{n}\psi_{n}

|\psi| = \sqrt{|a_{0}\psi_{0}|^{2} + |a_{1}\psi_{1}|^{2} + ... + |a_{n}\psi_{n}|^{2}}

\int |\psi|^{2}dq = \int |a_{0}\psi_{0}|^{2}dq + \int |a_{1}\psi_{1}|^{2}dq + ... + \int |a_{n}\psi_{n}|^{2}dq

= |a_{0}|^{2}\int |\psi_{0}|^{2}dq + |a_{1}|^{2}\int |\psi_{1}|^{2}dq + ... + |a_{n}|^{2}\int |\psi_{n}|^{2}dq

Truth of this rests on the truth of two identities for complex numbers.

|(a+bi)(c+di)|^{2} = |a+bi|^{2}|c+di|^{2} IDENTITY ONE
According to my calculations this is true.

|(a+c) + (b+d)i|^{2} = |a+bi|^{2} + |c+di|^{2} IDENTITY TWO
According to my calculations this is false, unless there is a constraint 2ac = -2bd.

What is going on here? Is there some sort of constraint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your missing piece of information is that the \psi_n are orthogonal, that is,

\int \psi^*_m(q) \psi_n(q) dq = 0

for m \ne n.

This is what let's you go from

<br /> \psi = a_{0}\psi_{0} + a_{1}\psi_{1} + ... + a_{n}\psi_{n}<br />

to

<br /> \int |\psi|^{2}dq = \int |a_{0}\psi_{0}|^{2}dq + \int |a_{1}\psi_{1}|^{2}dq + ... + \int |a_{n}\psi_{n}|^{2}dq<br />
 
Thanks I think that makes a lot of sense.

Basically "cross terms" looking similar to

\psi^*_m(q) \psi_n(q)

arise in the expression for |\psi|^{2}, and are eliminated when they are integrated, leaving only the terms looking like

\psi^*_n(q) \psi_n(q)

Thanks a bunch.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K