# How many degrees( bachelor, or grad ) can have one have?

by vectorcube
 P: 247 Suppose X is a successful practicing lawyer. He already had a bachelor degree, and some graduate degrees under his belt. He realizes after watching startrek, he wants to be a research physicist in a university. Is he too late to go back to school? I suspect he needs to get in order: 1.Bachelors degree in physics. 2.Masters degree in physics. 3.Ph.d in physics. He would have to get all 1, 2 and 3 in order to reach his dream of being a research physicist. My question is: Is there a limit to he number of graduate degrees one can get in a lifetime?
P: 4,542
 Quote by vectorcube Suppose X is a successful practicing lawyer. He already had a bachelor degree, and some graduate degrees under his belt. He realizes after watching startrek, he wants to be a research physicist in a university. Is he too late to go back to school? I suspect he needs to get in order: 1.Bachelors degree in physics. 2.Masters degree in physics. 3.Ph.d in physics. He would have to get all 1, 2 and 3 in order to reach his dream of being a research physicist. My question is: Is there a limit to he number of graduate degrees one can get in a lifetime?
Although this wouldn't apply for PhD's theres possibly no limit for undergraduate or graduate coursework you can do but the money would be fairly high so I guess if you can fund it and have the tenacity to get through it then the skys the limit!
P: 247
 Quote by chiro Although this wouldn't apply for PhD's theres possibly no limit for undergraduate or graduate coursework you can do but the money would be fairly high so I guess if you can fund it and have the tenacity to get through it then the skys the limit!

So i guess you can  t get more than one ph.d s? Just curious!

P: 466

## How many degrees( bachelor, or grad ) can have one have?

It's rarely allowed (most departments won't let someone who already has a Ph.D. earn another one), plus most Ph.D.'s you talk to will probably balk at the idea of going through the whole ordeal again.
P: 247
 Quote by Monocles It's rarely allowed (most departments won't let someone who already has a Ph.D. earn another one), plus most Ph.D.'s you talk to will probably balk at the idea of going through the whole ordeal again.
Yep, i am sure it is hard work getting that ph.d, but the official policy for a university is limited to the number of graduate degrees where the degree is obtained. That means, there is a quota on the number of degrees one can get at a particular university. At least that is all i know from a career councelor at ucla. Curiously, a person can get a ph.d at university A, and go to university B to get a second one. In reality, it is all about networking. It is about who you know. My friend got admitted at a phd program from a masters just by knowing a few good friends. Not sure if you can network you way into a second ph.d from the same institution.
 P: 1,069 Actually, when it comes to Ph.D.s, university B might not let you in because you already have a Ph.D. from university A. But the actual policy depends on university B. As for undergraduate and graduate degrees, the only real limits are time and money. Take a look at Michael D. Griffin, former head of NASA, for some idea of what is possible. And I'm sure he doesn't hold a record here... I also have to say, I'm slightly skeptical about the possibility of getting into a physics Ph.D. program with nothing more than a good physics GRE score. I'd love to hear about someone who's done it though.
P: 247
I don  t think a good GRE physics is enough to get into a top or even good ph.d program. It is probable better to apply for a masters, then follow by a ph.d.

Plus, i know alot of lawyers that hate their job.
P: 247
 Quote by TMFKAN64 Actually, when it comes to Ph.D.s, university B might not let you in because you already have a Ph.D. from university A. But the actual policy depends on university B.
I suspect a group of people will sit in a room to vote on it.

 As for undergraduate and graduate degrees, the only real limits are time and money. Take a look at Michael D. Griffin, former head of NASA, for some idea of what is possible. And I'm sure he doesn't hold a record here...
Who is Michael D. Griffin?
P: 985
 I don  t think a good GRE physics is enough to get into a top or even good ph.d program. It is probable better to apply for a masters, then follow by a ph.d. Plus, i know alot of lawyers that hate their job.
It's often a combined MS/Ph.D. program. Since MS in physics in and of itself is fairly worthless, it's given out as sort of a consolation prize for those who drop out before completing their theses.

800 on GRE subject physics and general math, plus a strong essay, plus an assurance that Mr. X does not require funding and will pay out of his own pocket, plus some good references, especially from a professor in the physics department of the university, should be enough to get him into a top 50 program. That's speaking from experience. If X has an eye on Harvard or Berkeley, that's a different story, and those places are mighty hard to get in even with a bona fide bachelor's in physics.

How much does our theoretical lawyer make, including bonus? Since he's stated to be successful, I'll have to presume at least 150K, possibly upwards of 200K ... if he becomes a research scientist at a university, he'll have to work hard to break into six figures again. Not to mention all the foregone income.

 Who is Michael D. Griffin?
Former head of NASA. Use Wiki.
 P: 2,363 This idea of an MSc degree being a "consolation prize" for those who can't obtain a PhD is not universal and in my opinion is a poor way of looking at the degree. Many people will opt for a master's program because they want to advance their study of a subject beyond the undergraduate level, but are not interested in academia. Or, they want to investigate a research field, but do not want to commit 4-5 full time years of work to it. In some cases people in PhD programs who fail the candidacy examination are given the option of completing an MSc, but my experience has been that this is more the exception than the rule. With respect to pursuing a second PhD, I'm sure there are rules in place in some institutions against this, but they're not universal so I would say that in general it is possible. There are lots of cases in medical physics of people who already have PhDs in other fields (including other branches of physics) returning to school for an MSc degree to enter the field professionally. Since the original question was about jumping from law into physics, I suspect the "second" PhD rules won't apply because an LLB or JD is not a PhD. Like an MD, the JD is a professional degree.
P: 247
 It's often a combined MS/Ph.D. program. Since MS in physics in and of itself is fairly worthless, it's given out as sort of a consolation prize for those who drop out before completing their theses. 800 on GRE subject physics and general math, plus a strong essay, plus an assurance that Mr. X does not require funding and will pay out of his own pocket, plus some good references, especially from a professor in the physics department of the university, should be enough to get him into a top 50 program. That's speaking from experience. If X has an eye on Harvard or Berkeley, that's a different story, and those places are mighty hard to get in even with a bona fide bachelor's in physics.
MS is a consolation prize? Really?

If all there is are MS/PH.D combined programs.
Think of a person Z that got a degree in socialogy, and wants to be a ph.d in physics after working in an engineering company for a while. Under your plan. He would need to pick up all the math and physics for a bachelor in physics and math by self-study. As much as i find it easy to do, i highly doubt other people can study like that. This itself is quite implausible if it is true. Secondly, if all there is are combined MS/Phd programs, this would entail Z to apply for a ph.d in physics after his bachelor in sociology. That is a big change. This is also quite implausible. In fact, i never seen anyone in such situation made it that way.

"How much does our theoretical lawyer make, including bonus? Since he's stated to be successful, I'll have to presume at least 150K, possibly upwards of 200K ... if he becomes a research scientist at a university, he'll have to work hard to break into six figures again. Not to mention all the foregone income."

First of all. I never said anything about "theoretical lawyer"( what is that anyway?). Secondly, my reply in the previous post is to state that i know alot of lawyers that hated their job. This does not at all entail they do not have a fat paycheck. Conceivably, the reason they hate their job is because they don t like what they do in a day to day basis.

"Former head of NASA. Use Wiki. "

I did us wiki. That is not at all why i ask. I ask because i don t know why the head of NASA factors into our discussion.
P: 247
 Quote by Choppy This idea of an MSc degree being a "consolation prize" for those who can't obtain a PhD is not universal and in my opinion is a poor way of looking at the degree. Many people will opt for a master's program because they want to advance their study of a subject beyond the undergraduate level, but are not interested in academia. Or, they want to investigate a research field, but do not want to commit 4-5 full time years of work to it. In some cases people in PhD programs who fail the candidacy examination are given the option of completing an MSc, but my experience has been that this is more the exception than the rule.
Obviously, there are many reasons for why someone whould opt for a MS. One reason might be that person X had a different non-physics major, and wants to go into physics research. Obviously, getting that M.S entail studying all the lower, and upper division courses he did not take in his undergrad edu. It is outright crazy if X got admitted into a ph.d program, and yet, had to take upper division courses with the rest of the undergrads.

 With respect to pursuing a second PhD, I'm sure there are rules in place in some institutions against this, but they're not universal so I would say that in general it is possible. There are lots of cases in medical physics of people who already have PhDs in other fields (including other branches of physics) returning to school for an MSc degree to enter the field professionally.
That s probably right. Would you agree with the following:

1.The number of masters one can get? The sky is the limit assuming that money is not a limitation.

2. The number of Ph.D one can get? Maybe. There are no fixed policy in place.
P: 1,069
 Quote by vectorcube I did use wiki. That is not at all why i ask. I ask because i don t know why the head of NASA factors into our discussion.
He's got 7 or 8 degrees, which is why I mentioned him. (Not honorary degrees either... real ones.)
P: 21,400
 Quote by TMFKAN64 He's got 7 or 8 degrees, which is why I mentioned him. (Not honorary degrees either... real ones.)
I thought about Griffin when I saw the thread title. Sometimes, one has to lead a horse to water.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael...ffin#Education

 Quote by vectorcube First of all. I never said anything about "theoretical lawyer"( what is that anyway?).
I believe hamster was referring to the "hypothetical" lawyer in the OP.

As question is how can a lawyer become of research physicist. Ostensibly, he/she must obtain a PhD, or perhaps an MS my suffice, depending on the competition, type of research and institution in which said research is conducted.

The starting point probably depends on academic and professional experience. If one has no math or physics background, then likely one will start at nearly scratch. If one has experience with basic math (calculus) and physics (basic mechanics/dynamics/thermo/EM/Intro QM) then one could ostensibly do upper level or remedial graduate courses for 1 or 2 years, then a MS in 2 years. If necessary, a PhD follows in 2 to 4 years.

Being a professional student takes only time and money - as well as the capability.
P: 985
 Quote by Choppy This idea of an MSc degree being a "consolation prize" for those who can't obtain a PhD is not universal and in my opinion is a poor way of looking at the degree. Many people will opt for a master's program because they want to advance their study of a subject beyond the undergraduate level, but are not interested in academia. Or, they want to investigate a research field, but do not want to commit 4-5 full time years of work to it. In some cases people in PhD programs who fail the candidacy examination are given the option of completing an MSc, but my experience has been that this is more the exception than the rule.
Two random examples.

Northwestern: https://www.tgs.northwestern.edu/aca...sics/msdegree/

"Students are not admitted separately for the master's degree. Only students in the PhD program can elect to apply for an MS degree. " (without elaborating)

"The department does not offer a terminal Master of Science program. The MS degree is awarded to students in the PhD program after satisfying the requirements described above. "

 Secondly, my reply in the previous post is to state that i know alot of lawyers that hated their job. This does not at all entail they do not have a fat paycheck. Conceivably, the reason they hate their job is because they don t like what they do in a day to day basis.
Could have been worse. Mr. X could have been a proctologist. All I'm saying, money should factor in, because the switch would involve a decrease in his quality of life (outside work).
P: 6,863
 Quote by vectorcube Suppose X is a successful practicing lawyer. He already had a bachelor degree, and some graduate degrees under his belt. He realizes after watching startrek, he wants to be a research physicist in a university. Is he too late to go back to school?
When you are a graduate student at a university, you are a physics researcher, so if you don't care about the title and you have the money, just find some professor that is willing to be your advisor and start researching.

It's important to realize that you get your Ph.D. *AFTER* you've demonstrated the ability to do physics research. It's something of a prerequisite for getting a full time job as a researcher, but it's not a prerequisite for doing research, since that's what you'll be doing as a graduate student.

Also don't get too many odd notions about what the job of a researcher is like. Most of it involves frustration and druggery. If you aren't prepared for huge amounts of frustration and druggery, you'll get disillusioned pretty quickly.
P: 6,863
 Quote by hamster143 If X has an eye on Harvard or Berkeley, that's a different story, and those places are mighty hard to get in even with a bona fide bachelor's in physics.
It's not that hard to do research with Harvard or Berkeley physicists. Just hang around the campus enough, attend seminars and network.

 Related Discussions Career Guidance 4 Academic Guidance 41 General Discussion 13 Academic Guidance 2 Academic Guidance 16