Register to reply

Particles: X(3872) and Z(4430) ?

by Openeye
Tags: particles, x3872, z4430
Share this thread:
Feb10-11, 03:53 PM
P: 29
Does anyone have more info about this?

Are these not considered fundamental or what makes them so different?

Additional info requested posted 'seperately' so as not to contaminate the thread with SIDE INFORMATION. If you are addressing this side info please PM me so we can keep this thread about X(3872) and Z(4430) and not supposedly 're-open' the thread that's CLOSED. (I don't get it... how can _I_ (a non-moderator) re-open a thread that is closed/locked?)

Also, I originally posted my 'other' (no link to it) thread into quantum physics forum, but it was moved to this general physics forum. If I am asking a quantum physics question here, sorry, I am only posting here because I figure it would end up back here. Feel free to move it as necessary.

Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
Three's a charm: NIST detectors reveal entangled photon triplets
How did evolution optimize circadian clocks?
New webcast series brings cutting-edge physics talks to the world
Feb10-11, 05:40 PM
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,997
Looks to me like we don't have enough evidence to make a determination on what exactly they are. However, it does seem that they are made of quarks and are therefore not fundamental.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
There are N point particles in a volume V. Find the mean distance between particles. Introductory Physics Homework 1
If particles always decay into particles of smaller mass, how are larger particles... Quantum Physics 4
Global particles, local particles (Colosi, Rovelli) Beyond the Standard Model 0
New Particle: X(3872) Quantum Physics 15