| New Reply |
Representation of Angular Momentum Operator in the (j,j') |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb11-11, 12:49 AM | #1 |
|
|
Representation of Angular Momentum Operator in the (j,j')
Hello All,
I'm trying to understand how the (j,j') representation of the Lorentz group. Following Ryder, I can see why we define A=J+iK and B=J-iK, which each form an SU(2) group. So it's clear to me what the rep of these generators is when acting on a state (j,j'): [tex]Rep(A)\otimes1+1\otimes Rep(B)[/tex]. Where Rep(A) and Rep(B) are the appropriate j and j' reps. My question is this: given the rep [tex](j,j')\oplus(j',j)[/tex], what is the induced rep on the generators? For example how do I act with A or J on this state? Thanks a whole bunch |
| Feb11-11, 01:20 AM | #2 |
|
|
If you have a representation [tex]r[/tex] and associated generators [tex]R[/tex], then the generators for the representation [tex]r\oplus r'[/tex] are
[tex]\begin{pmatrix} R & 0 \\ 0& R'\end{pmatrix}.[/tex] As a sort of converse, if a representation [tex]\tilde{r}[/tex] is reducible to a sum [tex]r\oplus r'[/tex], then the generators [tex]\tilde{R}[/tex] are block diagonal, as above. |
| Feb11-11, 02:07 AM | #3 |
|
|
Thanks for the quick reply. But I didn't understand. In the [tex](1/2,1)\oplus(1,1/2)[/tex] of Lorentz, does the operator A (the left SU(2)) look like this
[tex] \begin{pmatrix} A_{2\times2} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1_{3\times3} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & A_{3\times3} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1_{2\times2} \end{pmatrix} [/tex] |
| Feb11-11, 02:26 AM | #4 |
|
|
Representation of Angular Momentum Operator in the (j,j')[tex] \begin{pmatrix} A_{2\times2} & 0 \\ 0 & A_{3\times3} \end{pmatrix} [/tex] |
| Feb11-11, 02:42 AM | #5 |
|
|
Sorry I still don't understand. Each (j,j') is a (2j+1)X(2j'+1) dimensional vector space. So in the case of [tex](1/2,1)\oplus(1,1/2)[/tex] it should be a twelve dimensional vector space. What you wrote is five dimensional. Maybe the answer is [tex] A_{2\times2}\otimes 1_{3\times3} \oplus A_{3\times3}\otimes 1_{2\times2} [/tex]? This would give
[tex] \begin{pmatrix} \left( A_{2\times2}\otimes 1_{3\times3} \right)_{6\times 6} & 0 \\ 0 & \left( A_{3\times3}\otimes 1_{2\times2} \right)_{6\times 6} \end{pmatrix} [/tex] which is a twelve dim operator like I'd expect. Does this make any sense? Thank!! |
| Feb11-11, 04:58 AM | #6 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
| Tags |
| dirac spinor, generator, lorentz, poincare, representation |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Representation of Angular Momentum Operator in the (j,j')
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Quantum mechanics: Matrix representation of the momentum operator | Introductory Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| Express for Operator of coordinate in momentum representation | Advanced Physics Homework | 18 | ||
| QM: Operator in momentum representation | Advanced Physics Homework | 4 | ||
| Does Linear momentum operator and angular momentum operator | Advanced Physics Homework | 2 | ||
| How do we get the x-representation of the momentum operator? | General Physics | 19 | ||