Can a robot be called as Living thing?

*nismaratwork*

Quote by Grimstone

we are not defining alive with "what if's".

We define everything in those terms.

Grimstone

I do not agree. We do not define knowledge with "what it" we define it with facts, proven and re-creatable data that is as close to irrefutable as possible.

the "what ifs" are what causes science to look for the facts to prove or disprove it.

The truth is. we need the What ifs, they help the sturdy minded, non free thinking, humans to look outside the box.

*nismaratwork*

Quote by Grimstone

I do not agree. We do not define knowledge with "what it" we define it with facts, proven and re-creatable data that is as close to irrefutable as possible.

the "what ifs" are what causes science to look for the facts to prove or disprove it.

The truth is. we need the What ifs, they help the sturdy minded, non free thinking, humans to look outside the box.

Then by all means, tell me how you prove an artificial construct for humans to demarcate something that only matters to us?

The truth may be, but we deal with theories, all of which are wrong... and that's not my original thinking there. In a science as far from physics as biology, you begin to tread the waters between science and art.

Grimstone

Quote by nismaratwork

Then by all means, tell me how you prove an artificial construct for humans to demarcate something that only matters to us?

The truth may be, but we deal with theories, all of which are wrong... and that's not my original thinking there. In a science as far from physics as biology, you begin to tread the waters between science and art.

I may misunderstand your request to "prove an artificial construct for humans to demarcate something that only matters to us"

In truth I had to look Demarcate up.
if to make a construct set the boundaries we wish, that matter to us. its called programing.
I'm not trying to be a jerk. but i did not want to let a lack of response mean i was mistaken.

What I meant by the "what if" is that we are looking to define what is "alive" and not what if we use bioengineering to blah blah blah. it was opening a road to a different destination.

*nismaratwork*

Quote by Grimstone

I may misunderstand your request to "prove an artificial construct for humans to demarcate something that only matters to us"

In truth I had to look Demarcate up.
if to make a construct set the boundaries we wish, that matter to us. its called programing.
I'm not trying to be a jerk. but i did not want to let a lack of response mean i was mistaken.

What I meant by the "what if" is that we are looking to define what is "alive" and not what if we use bioengineering to blah blah blah. it was opening a road to a different destination.

Ahhhh... you mean what do we treat as life, vs. what we treat as a "creation" of ours and a tool?

Similar Threads for: Can a robot be called as Living thing?
Thread	Forum	Replies
Can the mass of a planet or any object affect the growth of a living thing?	Biology	15
Is this an ego thing, a dishonesty thing, or a smart thing to do? (concerning grades)	Academic Guidance	10
Are We a Living Thing?	General Discussion	17
E-Book of What is this thing called Sience?	General Discussion	2
What differentiates the living from the non-living?	General Discussion	28

Grimstone	I do not agree. We do not define knowledge with "what it" we define it with facts, proven and re-creatable data that is as close to irrefutable as possible. the "what ifs" are what causes science to look for the facts to prove or disprove it. The truth is. we need the What ifs, they help the sturdy minded, non free thinking, humans to look outside the box.