Why can we freely disposal the renormalization conditions?


by ndung200790
Tags: conditions, disposal, freely, renormalization
ndung200790
ndung200790 is offline
#1
Jun7-11, 10:06 PM
P: 520
Please teach me this:
The parameters(mass,interaction constant) in classical Lagrangian can be freely changed in classical framwork,but how about in quantum framework?Then why we can freely arrange the renormalization conditions,because I think that we do not know whether the parameters can freely be changed in quantum framework.
Thank you very much in advanced.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
ndung200790
ndung200790 is offline
#2
Jun7-11, 11:01 PM
P: 520
And why we can put the condition: 1PI=0 at square(p)= -square(M)(spacelike momentum)(e.g in the renormalization of Phi4 theory)?
ndung200790
ndung200790 is offline
#3
Jun8-11, 12:29 AM
P: 520
In ordinary renormalization procedure,there are some relation with m(mass),that becomes singular at m=0.Then are there any wrong with this renormalization procedure or are there exist the redudancy configuration in case m=0,so in this case there is exist an infinity?

ndung200790
ndung200790 is offline
#4
Jun8-11, 03:18 AM
P: 520

Why can we freely disposal the renormalization conditions?


At the moment,I see that the ''classical'' parameters relate with the quantum factors,so we can change the ''classical'' parameters,then the quantum factors are dependently changed.So that we can freely disposal the renormalization conditions.
vanhees71
vanhees71 is offline
#5
Jun8-11, 03:39 AM
Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 2,139
All the parameters in QFT are not given from theory but have to be fit to experiment. Sometimes relations between quantities are constraint by symmetry principles, particularly local gauge symmetry (Ward-Takahashi/Slavnov-Taylor identities). You find a rather detailed explanation concerning basic renormalization theory in my QFT manuscript:

http://theorie.physik.uni-giessen.de.../publ/lect.pdf
A. Neumaier
A. Neumaier is offline
#6
Jun8-11, 05:14 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,942
Quote Quote by ndung200790 View Post
Please teach me this:
The parameters(mass,interaction constant) in classical Lagrangian can be freely changed in classical framework,but how about in quantum framework?Then why we can freely arrange the renormalization conditions,because I think that we do not know whether the parameters can freely be changed in quantum framework.
The parameters define (both in classical and in quantum mechanics a family of theories,
from which one is picked by the renormalization conditions to match a real system.
Quote Quote by ndung200790 View Post
Thank you very much in advanced.
Since you repeat the same incorrect phrase over and over again: It should read ''Thank you very much in advance.''
ndung200790
ndung200790 is offline
#7
Jun8-11, 08:38 AM
P: 520
Thanks very much for all your helpfull answers!My English still weak,I am Vietnamese.

By the way,it seem that the Ward-Takahashi identity is accepted at the begining.They accept the corresponding symmetry for the diagrams as a proposition.But why we are permited to do that?
A. Neumaier
A. Neumaier is offline
#8
Jun8-11, 09:43 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,942
Quote Quote by ndung200790 View Post
By the way,it seem that the Ward-Takahashi identity is accepted at the beginning.They accept the corresponding symmetry for the diagrams as a proposition.But why we are permitted to do that?
It is _derived_ from the symmetry of the action.

Thus the only question is why we are permitted to use a symmetric action. The answer to that is because it proved to work!
ndung200790
ndung200790 is offline
#9
Jun8-11, 10:29 PM
P: 520
It seem that the symmetry of Lagrangian is not the same symmetry of correlation functions.Then the symmetry of Lagrangian is not the symmetry of corresponding diagrams.The symmetry of the Lagrangian is the same symmetry of correlation only happens when it also is the symmetry of the product of operators of fields at fix spacetime points.
ndung200790
ndung200790 is offline
#10
Jun9-11, 05:48 AM
P: 520
It seem that some UV cut-off violate Ward-Takahashi Identity,some make the dependence on m(mass) that become singularity at m=0.Then what is the best regulation(the cutting-off the UV divergence)?
A. Neumaier
A. Neumaier is offline
#11
Jun9-11, 06:31 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,942
Quote Quote by ndung200790 View Post
It seem that some UV cut-off violate Ward-Takahashi Identity,some make the dependence on m(mass) that become singularity at m=0.Then what is the best regulation(the cutting-off the UV divergence)?
dimensional regularization seems to be the best for this.
ndung200790
ndung200790 is offline
#12
Jun9-11, 08:25 AM
P: 520
What is the error we meet when we use the ''not good'' regularity?How about the ''wrong'' when we use the ordinary renormalization, in this case, two types of counterterm ''entangle'' with each other(meaning the mass couterterm delta m and scale counterterm delta Z be subtracted at the same time).In the case there is a dependence on m(mass) and it becomes singularity at m=0(S-matrix=........log(....../square(m)))
ndung200790
ndung200790 is offline
#13
Jun9-11, 08:48 AM
P: 520
In Phi4 theory,at one loop pertubative,with dimension regularity,there is a singularity above(...log(.../square(m))).This problem is solved by renomalization group method.But how ''wrong'' is it with the ordinary renormalization procedure?
A. Neumaier
A. Neumaier is offline
#14
Jun9-11, 08:53 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 1,942
Quote Quote by ndung200790 View Post
In Phi4 theory,at one loop pertubative,with dimension regularity,there is a singularity above(...log(.../square(m))).This problem is solved by renomalization group method.But how ''wrong'' is it with the ordinary renormalization procedure?
To find out how wrong something is, one must compute to higher orders or by different, more accurate methods, and compare. I don't know about this particular case.

Doing high accuracy computations in quantum field theory outside the well-trodden paths is always a mix of art and science!


Register to reply

Related Discussions
nuclear waste disposal by breakdown Nuclear Engineering 13
Acid Gas Disposal Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1
drip disposal Mechanical Engineering 7
Question; Renormalization Conditions General Physics 1
Renormalization Conditions Quantum Physics 3