Register to reply

Irreducible Polynomials over Finite Fields

by burritoloco
Tags: fields, finite, irreducible, polynomials
Share this thread:
burritoloco
#1
Jun15-11, 04:06 PM
P: 85
Hi, yet another question regarding polynomials :). Just curious about this.

Let f(x), g(x) be irreducible polynomials over the finite field GF(q) with coprime degrees n, m resp. Let [itex]\alpha , \beta[/itex] be roots of f(x), g(x) resp. Then the roots of f(x), g(x), are [itex]\alpha^{q^i}, 0\leq i \leq n-1[/itex], and [itex]\beta^{q^j}, 0\leq j \leq m-1[/itex].

Question: What is the irreducible polynomial over GF(q) of degree nm with roots [itex]\alpha^{q^i}\beta^{q^j}[/itex] where [itex]0\leq i \leq n-1[/itex], and [itex]0\leq j \leq m-1[/itex]. Can you define such polynomial explicitly in terms of just f(x) and g(x) without the roots appearing in the formula?

Note: The last sentence/question is what really interests me as the following is the required polynomial (but defined in terms of the roots of f(x))

[tex]F(x) = \prod_{i=0}^{n-1}\alpha^{mq^i}g\left(\alpha^{-q^i}x\right)[/tex]

Thank you!
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Scientists develop 'electronic nose' for rapid detection of C. diff infection
Why plants in the office make us more productive
Tesla Motors dealing as states play factory poker
Hurkyl
#2
Jun15-11, 05:49 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Hurkyl's Avatar
P: 16,091
It depends somewhat on just what you mean by "formula" and "appearing in".

I know that F can be expressed as a resultant. The formula you give is presumably comes from one of the methods of computing resultants. There exist other ways to compute resultants, such as as the determinant of a matrix, or a Euclidean algorithm-like method.

You could always find a way to write down the system of equations that literally expresses that [itex]\alpha \beta[/itex] is a root of F(x). Then F would be the solution!
burritoloco
#3
Jun15-11, 06:15 PM
P: 85
I see. I was expecting some kind of miracle where F(x) could be expressed as some sort of polynomial compositions of f(x), g(x) and their reciprocals, but this matter turns out to be even more complicated than I was hoping. Here's a paper I have just found on this topic.

http://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&l...page&q&f=false

Theorem 4.2 says it all...

Hurkyl
#4
Jun15-11, 06:25 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Hurkyl's Avatar
P: 16,091
Irreducible Polynomials over Finite Fields

Ah! The resultant formulas I was recalling are formulas 4.3 and 4.4. (Appearing just before theorem 4.3)
burritoloco
#5
Jun15-11, 07:02 PM
P: 85
Thanks Hurkyl. I'll probably be coming up with more questions as my project goes along :). Feel free to answer whenever you can, haha. Great to have Physics Forums around.
burritoloco
#6
Jun15-11, 08:21 PM
P: 85
Hmm, resultants and Thm 4.2 seem to be general methods on any two polynomials f(x), g(x) to obtain F(x). What if there are special classes of polynomials for which this computation could be done totally differently and much faster than the O(n^3 log^2(n)) in their paper? But what is this all good for anyways lol.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Fast Construction of Irreducible Polynomials of degree n over any Finite Field Linear & Abstract Algebra 1
Fast Construction of Irreducible Polynomials of degree n over any Finite Field General Math 1
Modern Algebra: Fields/Polynomials/Irreducible Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Finite fields and products of polynomials Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Irreducible polynomials over finite fields Linear & Abstract Algebra 15