## Srednicki 43.10

Trivial question...

How exactly does the minus sign arise in eq. 43.10? The sentence below states because the functional derivative goes through one spinor, but I can't see how that works...

book is online here http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/ms-qft-DRAFT.pdf

equation 43.10 is on pdf page 273

thank you
 PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Is there an invisible tug-of-war behind bad hearts and power outages?>> Penetrating the quantum nature of magnetism>> Rethinking the universe: Groundbreaking theory proposed in 1997 suggests a 'multiverse'
 i'll take a shot. let me argue by analogy, maybe making the rule plausible. suppose i have anticommuting numbers x,y,h. and i'm given the expression yx and i want to differentiate it with respect to x. lacking any better choice i form the difference quotient $$\frac{d}{dx}(yx) = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{h} ( y(x+h) - yx )$$ $$= \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{h} yh$$ now because the numbers are anticommuting i can't just cancel h. i have to first swap yh or h^(-1) and y and then i can cancel. $$= \lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\left( -y \frac{1}{h} h \right)= -y$$
 qbert, I thank you very much!

 Similar discussions for: Srednicki 43.10 Thread Forum Replies Quantum Physics 3 Quantum Physics 2 Quantum Physics 3 Quantum Physics 6 Calculus & Beyond Homework 4