Srednicki 43.10


by Lapidus
Tags: 4310, srednicki
Lapidus
Lapidus is offline
#1
Jul1-11, 02:24 AM
P: 270
Trivial question...

How exactly does the minus sign arise in eq. 43.10? The sentence below states because the functional derivative goes through one spinor, but I can't see how that works...

book is online here http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/ms-qft-DRAFT.pdf

equation 43.10 is on pdf page 273

thank you
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Information storage for the next generation of plastic computers
Scientists capture ultrafast snapshots of light-driven superconductivity
Progress in the fight against quantum dissipation
qbert
qbert is offline
#2
Jul1-11, 03:07 AM
P: 185
i'll take a shot.

let me argue by analogy, maybe making the rule plausible. suppose i have anticommuting
numbers x,y,h. and i'm given the expression yx and i want to differentiate it with respect to x.

lacking any better choice i form the difference quotient
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}(yx) = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{h} ( y(x+h) - yx ) [/tex]
[tex] = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{h} yh [/tex]
now because the numbers are anticommuting i can't just cancel h. i have to first swap
yh or h^(-1) and y and then i can cancel.

[tex] = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\left( -y \frac{1}{h} h \right)= -y [/tex]
Lapidus
Lapidus is offline
#3
Jul2-11, 04:04 AM
P: 270
qbert, I thank you very much!


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Srednicki 9.25 Quantum Physics 3
Srednicki P67 Quantum Physics 2
Srednicki 9.17, 9.18 Quantum Physics 3
srednicki p.81 Quantum Physics 6
Srednicki 7.14 ND 7.16 Calculus & Beyond Homework 4