Register to reply

Srednicki 43.10

by Lapidus
Tags: 4310, srednicki
Share this thread:
Jul1-11, 02:24 AM
P: 283
Trivial question...

How exactly does the minus sign arise in eq. 43.10? The sentence below states because the functional derivative goes through one spinor, but I can't see how that works...

book is online here

equation 43.10 is on pdf page 273

thank you
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
On-chip topological light: First measurements of transmission and delay
A two-stage trap for single protons leads to measurement of their magnetic properties
Unexpected phenomenon discovered at the surface of a transition metal oxide material
Jul1-11, 03:07 AM
P: 185
i'll take a shot.

let me argue by analogy, maybe making the rule plausible. suppose i have anticommuting
numbers x,y,h. and i'm given the expression yx and i want to differentiate it with respect to x.

lacking any better choice i form the difference quotient
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}(yx) = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{h} ( y(x+h) - yx ) [/tex]
[tex] = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{h} yh [/tex]
now because the numbers are anticommuting i can't just cancel h. i have to first swap
yh or h^(-1) and y and then i can cancel.

[tex] = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\left( -y \frac{1}{h} h \right)= -y [/tex]
Jul2-11, 04:04 AM
P: 283
qbert, I thank you very much!

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Srednicki 9.25 Quantum Physics 3
Srednicki P67 Quantum Physics 2
Srednicki 9.17, 9.18 Quantum Physics 3
Srednicki p.81 Quantum Physics 6
Srednicki 7.14 ND 7.16 Calculus & Beyond Homework 4