Register to reply

Special sequences in a product metric space

by holy_toaster
Tags: metric, product, sequences, space, special
Share this thread:
holy_toaster
#1
Jul22-11, 01:19 PM
P: 32
Hi there,

I came across the following problem and I hope somebody can help me: I have some complete metric space [itex](X,d)[/itex] (non-compact) and its product with the reals [itex](R\times X, D)[/itex] with the metric [itex]D[/itex] just being [tex]D((t,x),(s,y))=|s-t|+d(x,y)[/tex] for [itex]x,y\in X; s,t\in R[/itex]. Then I have some sequences [itex]x_n\subset X[/itex], which converges to [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]t_n\subset R[/itex], which goes to infinity. These two give rise to sequences [itex](t_n,x)[/itex] and [itex](t_n,x_n)[/itex] in [itex]R\times X[/itex] which do not converge either, but nevertheless [tex]D((t_n,x),(t_n,x_n))\to 0[/tex] holds as [itex]n\to\infty[/itex]. Moreover I have now some continuous map [itex]f\colon R\times X\to X[/itex] and my problem is under what conditions does [tex]d(f(t_n,x),f(t_n,x_n))\to 0[/tex] hold as [itex]n\to\infty[/itex]?

I know that it does not hold in general as there are simple counterexamples and it does hold if [itex]f[/itex] is (globally) Lipschitz. But for my setting globally Lipschitz is quite restrictive, so I am looking for milder assumptions. Specifically I would be interested if it does hold when [itex]f[/itex] fulfills the following type of 'group condition': [tex]f(t+s,x)=f(t,f(s,x))[/tex] for all [itex]s,t\in R; x\in X[/itex]. I can not find a counterexample and cannot prove it either.

I know it's a quite specific problem, but I would be glad if somebody had an idea on that or could provide me with a source that helps because I am really stuck here with this.

Thanx.

PS: I think that [itex]X[/itex] is even a manifold and [itex]f[/itex] is smooth, but I don't think that makes much of a difference...
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
zhentil
#2
Jul22-11, 10:05 PM
P: 491
I think it might be difficult to formulate something so generally. Let X be the real numbers, and then we have a function from the plane to the line. Make it even simpler: let f(t,x)=t*h(x). When is infinity times zero zero?

It's an interesting question, and it's clear that one can do better than Lipschitz under certain conditions. But your group property doesn't do it: f(t,x)=xe^t is a counterexample.
holy_toaster
#3
Jul23-11, 06:15 AM
P: 32
But your group property doesn't do it: f(t,x)=xe^t is a counterexample.
I see. I now thought that in general uniform continuity could do it.

But in the case of my group property: Maybe it would be enough if I additionally demanded that [itex]f(t_n,x_n)\to x[/itex] as [itex]n\to\infty[/itex]?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Topological space, Euclidean space, and metric space: what are the difference? Calculus & Beyond Homework 9
Uniform Continuity of Sequences in Metric Space Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Einstein metric and Space-time metric Special & General Relativity 1
Relationships among metric structure, metric tensor, special and general relativity Special & General Relativity 18
Cauchy sequences in an inner product space Introductory Physics Homework 21