Register to reply 
Acceleration of a static testparticle 
Share this thread: 
#1
Mar212, 05:05 AM

P: 152

What is the correct expression for the acceleration of a static testparticle in coordinate time according to the Schwarzshild solution? I am a bit confused. I would like it to be the same as classically, ## d\bar{v}/dt=\frac{GM}{r^2}\hat{r} ##, but according to "reflections on relativity":
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s604/604.htm The expression for the acceleration of a static testparticle is only the same as classically if you replace coordinate time with proper time, (see equation 6). I am guessing that this means that according to the Schwarzschild solution the acceleration of a static testparticle in coordinate time is [tex]\frac{d^2 r}{dt^2} =  \frac{GM / {r^2}} { (1  {{2GM} {/} {rc^2}}) } [/tex] Is this correct? I would like to have it that relativity will only come in to play when the testparticle has started moving but according to the above it will also play a role in the static case... 


#2
Mar212, 11:21 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160

Ok, we have to be careful what we mean. If you really truly mean the acceleration, as in a^{μ} = δv^{μ}/δτ, the acceleration of a particle falling freely is zero. If the particle is 'static', i.e. remains at constant r, the radial component of the acceleration is, as you say, GM/r^{2}, but this is outward.
To change the two d/dτ's to d/dt's one must divide by two factors of γ = dt/dτ, making it (r  2GM)GM/r^{3}. (I think you have the correction factor upside down.) 


#3
Mar212, 11:39 AM

Physics
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 6,251

[tex]a = \frac{GM}{r^{2} \sqrt{1  \frac{2 G M}{c^{2} r}}}[/tex] 


#4
Mar212, 11:42 AM

Physics
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 6,251

Acceleration of a static testparticle



#5
Mar212, 12:02 PM

P: 3,967

See post #1 of this old thread http://www.physicsforums.com/showthr...48#post2710548
(Note that the second equation given for the acceleration measured by a local observer is the same as the one given by Peter, just expressed in a different format.) Just to give you an idea where the equation comes from, start with the equation given by mathpages for the local acceleration in terms of the proper time and coordinate distance: [tex] \frac{d^2 r}{d\tau^2} = \frac{GM}{r^2} [/tex] and given that from the Schwarzschild metric the relation between proper time and coordinate time is: [tex] \frac {d\tau}{dt} = \sqrt{12GM/rc^2} [/tex] then: [tex] \frac{d^2 r}{d\tau^2}\frac{d\tau^2}{dt^2} = \frac{GM}{r^2}\frac{d\tau^2}{dt^2} [/tex] [tex] \frac{d^2 r}{dt^2} = \frac{GM(12GM/rc^2)}{r^2}[/tex] which is the acceleration in purely coordinate terms (as given by Bill_K). Similarly if you convert coordinate distance (dr) to proper distance (dr') you obtain the proper acceleration as measured locally as: [tex] \frac{d^2 r'}{dt^2} = \frac{GM}{r^2 \sqrt{12GM/rc^2}}[/tex] (as given by PeterDonnis). 


#6
Mar212, 12:14 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160

EDIT: r is the Schwarzchild radial coordinate 


#7
Mar212, 01:26 PM

Physics
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 6,251




#8
Mar212, 05:09 PM

P: 4,223

Potentially relevant:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=310397 


#9
Mar212, 05:30 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
P: 7,661

The expressions being written down are for the proper acceleration of the worldline of a static observer  coordinate time isn't used or needed.
If you want to somehow convert this to "coordinate time" rather than something that's specifiable without using coordinates, you'll have to do this bit of interpretation for yourself  I don't quite follow why you'd want to do that. I'm hoping that perhaps you didn't really want to. The logical answer for the "coordinate accleration" is zero, because the coordinates of a static observer are not changing with respect to coordinate time by definition. So what people are posting is the proper acceleration that an accelerometer would measure. In special relativity you would write [tex] a = \frac{d u}{d \tau} [/tex] where a is the 4accleration vector, and u is the fourvelocity vector. Given the acceleration 4vector, it's invariant length would give the magnitude of the proper acceleration of the worldline, which is what the formulas you're being given are all about. In general relativity, you have to replace the differential with a covariant derivative. I'm not sure if you're familiar with them, and if you are what sort of notation you prefer, so I"m not going to comment further on how to take the covariant derivative, as it would probalby be more confusing than helpful without knowing more about your background. (Which I seem to recall you mentioned once, but I'm afraid I forgot). You also use the metric in GR to compute the length of the fourvector. I'm hoping that you do know about fourvectors... 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Motion of a charged particle in a static magnetic field in matlab  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  0  
Static particle  Mechanical Engineering  1  
Static particle  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  0  
Static particle with tension  Introductory Physics Homework  3  
Trajectory of a Test Particle in a Semidetached Binary  Astronomy & Astrophysics  1 