Register to reply 
Associative Property of Convolution? 
Share this thread: 
#1
Mar812, 05:54 PM

P: 70

Hi,
I have a quick question about certain algebraic properties of convolution. If I have 3 functions x(f), y(f) and z(f), is the following true? [x(f) . g(f)] * z(f) = [x(f) * z(f)].g(f) I looked on Wikipedia but there's only a property like this if one of the terms is a scalar, so most likely I can't do relation described above? Thanks! 


#2
Mar912, 06:34 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 6,102

Your notation is confusing. (What is *, what is .?) However, in general, convolution is associative and communicative. The easiest way to see it is by looking at the relationship of the transforms, where convolution becomes multiplication, which is both associative and communicative.



#3
Mar912, 07:38 PM

P: 4,575

Hey DWill.
On top of what mathman said, you can prove it has these properties by resorting to the definition of convolution. Also if you aren't convinced, take a look at probability theory for finding the cumulative distribution for X,Y,Z where they are all independent (but not necessarily identically distributed) which is given by the convolution of all three pdf's. Because X + Y + Z = (X + Y) + Z = X + (Y + Z) = Y + X + Z = Z + X + Y and so on, you intuitively get the idea once you accept the theorem in probability that convolution must be associative and commutative. 


#4
Mar912, 07:49 PM

P: 70

Associative Property of Convolution?
Ok thanks mathman and chiro! That makes sense. I just wondered if the associative property still applied with three arbitrary functions, because in all the places I've looked so far there is only two functions and a scalar used for the associative property. I'll think about it a bit further but I think this clears it up.
And sorry if my notation was confusing, I was just going by the convention of the "." being multiplication and "*" being convolution. 


#5
Mar1012, 03:59 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 6,102




#6
Mar1012, 04:45 PM

P: 70

That's correct, the operation I was asking involves a convolution and a product. I looked at it more myself and tried it out on a few functions, and I think this might not be possible?
To further clarify, I was wondering if the product of the convolution of x(f) and g(f) with z(f) is equal to the product of the convolution of x(f) and z(f) with g(f)? 


#7
Mar1012, 05:35 PM

P: 4,575




#8
Mar1012, 06:22 PM

HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 7,708

Sorry, I couldn't resist. 


#9
Mar1112, 04:28 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 6,102




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Convolution property for InverseZtransform in Mathematica  Math & Science Software  1  
Linear Algebra  Associative property  Calculus & Beyond Homework  2  
Associative property of convolution  Calculus  2  
Can you explain this property of convolution?  Calculus  0  
Convolution Property  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  3 