A basic question about the use of a metric tensor in general relativityby roya Tags: basic, metric, relativity, tensor 

#1
Mar812, 10:45 AM

P: 19

I have very little knowledge in general relativity, though I do have a decent understanding of
the theory of special relativity. In special relativity, points in spacetime can be represented in Minkowski space (or a hyperbolic space) so that the metric tensor (that is derived in order to preserve the invariant interval) has a unique form corresponding to that space. From what I understand (and I say this with caution as I could easily be mistaken), since in the theory of general relativity light bends under the influence of gravity (does it?), this requires a more complicated set of coordinates hence the use of more complicated metric tensors to preserve the invariant interval in such curvilinear space. Is that correct? how would such metric tensor look like? 



#2
Mar812, 11:22 AM

P: 2,047

Yes, basically, but one caveat is that one has to realize that the metric tensor's components (which many people simply call the "metric") is highly nonunique and is completely dependent on the choice of basis vectors. Notice that even in SR, the metric does not have such a nice structure as diag(1,1,1,1) if we used polar coordinates (and corresponding coordinate basis vectors).
Also, even in GR, one can use what are socalled orthonormal bases (sometimes called tetrads or more esoterically vierbeins) such that the metric tensor always has the form it has in SR (i.e. diag(1,1,1,1)). In coordinate bases, the metric will tend to have a different form. For examples, you can see e.g. the Schwarzschild metric or the FLRW metric. 



#3
Mar1012, 07:51 AM

P: 19

thank you




#4
Mar1012, 08:11 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 4,446

A basic question about the use of a metric tensor in general relativityAnalogous to this is 4D Lorentzian spacetime which, for the most part is "flat", and amenable to the Minkowski metric (with constant metrical coefficients). However, in the vicinity of massive objects, 4D spacetime is curved, and cannot be described using a rectilinear orthogonal (Lorentzian) set of coordinates. It is as if the 4D spacetime had been deformed "out of plane" into the 5th dimension. All accelerated frames of reference must be regarded as nonflat. Thus, the hyperbolic space you described above is curved "out of the plane" of Lorentzian space, and cannot be described using the Minkowski metric. Similarly, the Schwartzchild metric applies to an accelerated frame of reference. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Derivative of contravariant metric tensor with respect to covariant metric tensor  Calculus & Beyond Homework  0  
General Tensor contraction: Trace of EnergyMomentum Tensor (Einstein metric)  Special & General Relativity  5  
Special relativity: components of a metric tensor  Introductory Physics Homework  2  
A basic question in general relativity  Special & General Relativity  3  
relationships among metric structure, metric tensor, special and general relativity  Special & General Relativity  18 