New Reply

Node-voltage Method, some misconception??

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
May5-12, 11:49 AM   #1
 

Node-voltage Method, some misconception??


Please check the attachment:
The question is written upon it

Sorry bad drawing, the circuit is closed from the left hand side but not from the right hand side.
Attached Thumbnails
Physics.png  
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
engineering news on PhysOrg.com

>> Researchers use light projector and single-pixel detectors to create 3-D images
>> GPS solution provides 3-minute tsunami alerts
>> Single-pixel power: Scientists make 3-D images without a camera
May5-12, 03:28 PM   #2
 
But I don't see any problem. We can choose any node we want as a reference point (GND).
 
May5-12, 03:53 PM   #3
 
But the essential node must connect at least 3 appliances!! Here we have only two :/
 
May5-12, 05:06 PM   #4
 

Node-voltage Method, some misconception??


But you can solve the circuit using nodal analysis without any "essential node".
And I still don't understand why you need "essential nodes"?
 
May6-12, 02:05 AM   #5
 
What's nodal analysis? How does it differ from node-voltage method. Elaborate please.
[I only learnt node-voltage method :p]
If we are talking only node-voltage method, how in the world did the Doctor consider the node below a reference when it only connects two appliances[see figure].
That's my question.
 
May6-12, 02:25 AM   #6
 
I just checked, and they mean the same. Yet again, this is against the rule.
 
May6-12, 03:03 AM   #7
 
Nodal analysis is exactly the same think as node-voltage method.
And we can choose any node we want as a reference point (GND).

See the example



We have a four nodes in our circuit. I pick as a reference point (GND) node 4.
So node 4 by de definition has a potential of 0 V.
So we left with three nodes. but we know that voltage at node 1 is equal 9V.
So we only has two unknown nodal voltages 2 and 3.
Now we apply KCL to the nodes where the unknown voltages appears.

For node 2 (I assume that all current flow out from the node)

[tex]\frac{V2}{R2} + \frac{V2 - V1}{R1} + \frac{V2 - V3}{R3} = 0 [/tex]

And we notice that V1 = E1 = 10V

Now we write KCL for node 3.

[tex]\frac{V3 - V2}{R3} + \frac{V3 - V1}{R4} = 0 [/tex]

And now all we have to do is to solve for V2 and V3

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i...-+9%29%2F9%3D0

V2 = 3V and V3 = Vth = 6V
Attached Thumbnails
bez*tytułu.PNG  
 
May6-12, 03:27 AM   #8
 
Lots of thanks Jhony, now I get it..
 
May6-12, 03:48 AM   #9
 
We always measure all the voltage respect to this common point (reference point), also known as a "ground" (GND). And we assume that GND have zero voltage.
Look ta this examples



Attached Thumbnails
0.1.PNG  
 
May6-12, 11:36 AM   #10
 
Thanks, that's very kind of you.
You really were helpful
 
New Reply

Tags
nodal analysis, node-voltage
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Node-voltage Method, some misconception??
Thread Forum Replies
Problem with Node Voltage Method Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 7
Use node voltage method to solve i2 vbe and vce Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 9
How do I know when to use the Mesh Current Method or Node Voltage Method? Electrical Engineering 1
Node-Voltage Method Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 5