
#1
May712, 10:04 AM

P: 18

If Eisenstein taught us the space time is one and the same thing, then how did he mathematicaly prove that. How did he put dimentions into his E=mc2 formula. The first 3 dimensions are strictly positions, positions in 3D require 3 numbers, and time is linear movement in one direction, the number being relative to whomever is making the measurement. My question is in order for Eisenstein's E=mc2 to have worked he needed to balance these factors in some how. How did he do it?




#2
May712, 10:17 AM

PF Gold
P: 4,081

You might spell the mans name properly. It is 'Einstein'.




#3
May712, 11:02 AM

Physics
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 5,503





#4
May712, 11:18 AM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,879

Einstein & DimensionsI'm not sure what your point is in saying "The first 3 dimensions are strictly positions ..." In the formula, E= mc^2, E is energy and in the "MKS" (Meters, Kilograms, Seconds) is measured in "Joules" which is equivalent to "kgm^2/s^2" the same as on the left side mass times a speed (which would be meters per second) squared. Energy is "kgm^2/s^2" because kinetic energy is "(1/2)mv^2" which has units of kg (m^2/s^2) and "work" (equivalent to energy) is "force times distance". Force has units, in MKS, of kgm/s, kilogram meters per second per second. Multiplying that by distance gives kgm^2/s^2 again. 



#5
May712, 01:09 PM

P: 18

who is Eisenstein? :)




#6
May712, 07:57 PM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 4,860

Did Eisenstein make science fiction films?




#7
May812, 11:52 AM

P: 5,634

Mathematicians deal with proof. Physicists deal with evidence.
It tooks Einstein several years as I recall to adopt the idea. ok, here is one reference: "How did he do it?" Genius!!!! Keen physical insights first. He used the mathematics of Lorentz and Fitzgerald [for SR] but applied his own insights especially that the speed of light is fixed for all observers. The above article explains how time and space 'switch places', are not fixed as in Newtonian physics, but vary according to observer. Your time and my time, for excample, will be different if we are in relative motion. 



#8
May812, 02:15 PM

P: 5,634

Derivation of mc^{2} is here....
http://www.btinternet.com/~j.doyle/SR/Emc2/Deriving.htm If you search EINSTEIN ONLINE you can probably find how HE did it. 



#9
Jul2312, 04:38 PM

Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
PF Gold
P: 10,925

Oh dear  one of the problems with asking questions about things you barely know about is that the questions come out wrong and you can get dumped on. I hope this didn't put you off.
I feel this question is related to later ones so I figured I'd revisit it... some of what I will say will be repeats of what the others have said. The massenergy relation is very famous but it is not the only relation concerning relativity. But it is clear that time, like this, is quite different  eg, the distance to a point (x,y) in space is [itex]\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/itex] but the distance to point (x,t)? You can't do: [itex]\sqrt{x^2+t^2}[/itex] can you? I have a feeling that this is what you are actually asking about. In order to make time play well with the position coordinates, we have to measure time in units of length. That's not as silly as it sounds. We turn a time into a length by multiplying it with a speed ... unfortunately the speed of something is relative to the observer: if only there were some speed that was the same for all observers, then we could describe the spacetime coordinates as (x,y,z,ct)  oh hey! :) Speed of light to the rescue! Notice that the c in "ct" acts as a constant of proportionality relating one way of looking at something to another. It is as valid to think of time and distance as the same thing as it is to think of mass and energy as the same thing. The trick with this sort of representation is you have to change the way a distance measurement is done ... the "distance" to an event in spacetime is [itex]r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2(ct)^2}[/itex] This should give you an idea of how time can get included as a dimension of space. My notation is a bit sloppy  you should read more around the subject of spacetime to get the conventions down properly. The idea here is to point you in a helpful direction to do your own searching, not to provide complete answers. 



#10
Jul2312, 05:37 PM

P: 526

I think (though I may be wrong) that the OP's question is how the view of spacetime came about.
In ordinary 3 dimensional space, we can perform certain operations on objects within this space, such as a vector. Most important is a transformation called a rotation, in which components of the vector in one direction become components in another direction. If you're moving with a certain velocity in the x direction, I can give you a rotation that will distribute your velocity between the x and y (or z) directions. So, we write concepts like velocity as three vectors, and treat the three dimensions as one space, because of the fact that we can rotate one component into another. In special relativity, the Lorentz transformation can be thought of a rotation through space and time  so, time receives a role that is dependent on space. Hence, 'spacetime'. 



#11
Jul2312, 08:56 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
P: 7,433

"Why do we consider northsouth and eastwest distances part of a larger, unified structure, rather than two independent dimensions" then you might be ready to read http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/spacetim...tEdThruP20.pdf for a rather interesting analogy, called "The Parable of the Surveyors". This is a publically available download of the intro to EF Taylor's textbook, "Space time Physics", a college level textbook on relativity. It suggests that the Lorentz transforms provides the same justification for regarding space as unified with time as geometry does for assuming that northsout is unified with eastwest. It is college level, though, so if you aren't quite ready to mathematically justify why northsouth and eastwest distances are part of a larger structure, it may be too advanced for you. My apologies if I'm condescending, or whatnot, but I have absolutely no idea of what your background is. 



#12
Jul2412, 06:16 PM

Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
PF Gold
P: 10,925

I think the problem here is that it is not quite clear what OP is trying to ask about. We are each replying from some interpretation ... what's needed not is feedback from OP to make the matter clear.




#13
Jul2512, 07:22 AM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,879

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein's_criterion No, he did not make science fiction movies but he did make movies "The Battleship Potemkin", "Ivan The Terrible", and "Alexander Nevsky". (I suppose it is possible that these were two different guys!) 



#14
Jul2512, 07:33 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 4,860

(I had no idea about the other Eisenstein  who died in 1852 and was German, not Russian  per wiki). 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Dimensions that are not space dimensions nor time dimensions.  General Physics  14  
Einstein's Nordic Assembly Speech,Einstein Quotations Etc.  General Discussion  1  
how to genarelize the vector product in three dimensions to higher dimensions?  Linear & Abstract Algebra  2  
Distances between samples in high dimensions. Curse of dimensions?  Differential Geometry  0  
Einstein makes extra dimensions TOE the line  General Physics  3 